Revisiting coping mechanisms on the street-level: a systematic literature review

Abstract Street-level bureaucrats’ (SLBs) coping mechanisms are an integral part of their interaction with clients, and as such have received much research attention. Since the last review of the behavioral coping mechanisms adopted by SLBs, conducted more than 10 years ago, many researchers have focused on understanding these mechanisms and what influences them. Using the PRISMA model, we conducted a systematic review of 165 studies to update our understanding and explore the manifestations of both old and new coping mechanisms identified in the literature. Moreover, we seek to determine the antecedents of these coping mechanisms. From our findings emerged a new family of coping mechanisms that we call “moving with clients.” These behaviors include intentional efforts to involve clients in the process of service delivery, for example, by deliberating and cooperating with them to achieve the desired policy goals. We find that most SLBs’ behaviors are associated with organizational and environmental factors. Personal factors, although highlighted frequently in the literature, are not associated with most coping behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaf022
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting coping mechanisms on the street-level: a systematic literature review

Nissim Cohen, Ofek Edri‐Peer
8 citations
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
33.61
article

Revisiting coping mechanisms on the street-level: a systematic literature review

Nissim Cohen, Ofek Edri‐Peer
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Street-level bureaucrats’ (SLBs) coping mechanisms are an integral part of their interaction with clients, and as such have received much research attention. Since the last review of the behavioral coping mechanisms adopted by SLBs, conducted more than 10 years ago, many researchers have focused on understanding these mechanisms and what influences them. Using the PRISMA model, we conducted a systematic review of 165 studies to update our understanding and explore the manifestations of both old and new coping mechanisms identified in the literature. Moreover, we seek to determine the antecedents of these coping mechanisms. From our findings emerged a new family of coping mechanisms that we call “moving with clients.” These behaviors include intentional efforts to involve clients in the process of service delivery, for example, by deliberating and cooperating with them to achieve the desired policy goals. We find that most SLBs’ behaviors are associated with organizational and environmental factors. Personal factors, although highlighted frequently in the literature, are not associated with most coping behaviors.

Journal of Public Administration Research and TheoryVol. 35(4)
University of Haifa (IL)
ISEF Foundation, Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Israel Science Foundation, University of Haifa, Iran Science Elites Federation
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
33.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting coping mechanisms on the street-level: a systematic literature review — Nissim Cohen, Ofek Edri‐Peer · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS