Resilience and Coping Strategies in Rural South Africa during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Study of Livelihoods, Food Security, and Socioeconomic Determinants

Abstract Considerable attention has been given to the socio-economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily focusing on urban settings, while little research has examined the effects on rural communities. This study investigated the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on livelihoods and food security in the rural area of Bushbuckridge, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. We utilized a panel data set comprising 454 households from the Sustainability in Communal Socio-Ecological Systems (SUCSES) survey, conducted in 2019 and 2021. To identify the determinants of food security over time, we employed difference-in-differences (DiD) panel regression models for the two time periods, focusing on key indicators of food security, including household food availability, dietary diversity, food access, and overall food security. The analysis revealed significant adverse impacts of the lockdown on local off-farm employment ( p < 0.05). In response, households increased their reliance on subsistence agriculture and natural resource use as coping mechanisms. Contrary to expectations, food security metrics improved during the study period. Higher levels of food security were associated with migrant employment, domestic assets, and the use of edible wild fruits and vegetables. In contrast, a high dependency on social grants was correlated with lower food security levels. The study highlights the diverse coping mechanisms rural households employed to adapt to pandemic-related disruptions, underscoring the importance of livelihood diversification. While short-term improvements in food security were observed, the decline in local off-farm employment poses risks to long-term resilience. These findings emphasize the need for targeted policy interventions that support the diversified livelihoods of rural households while strengthening social protection systems to sustain food security beyond crisis periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Ecology
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-025-00603-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resilience and Coping Strategies in Rural South Africa during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Study of Livelihoods, Food Security, and Socioeconomic Determinants

Wayne Twine, Lori M. Hunter, Farirai Rusere, Mark Collinson
1 citations
Human Ecology
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
3.13
article

Resilience and Coping Strategies in Rural South Africa during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Study of Livelihoods, Food Security, and Socioeconomic Determinants

Wayne Twine, Lori M. Hunter, Farirai Rusere, Mark Collinson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Considerable attention has been given to the socio-economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily focusing on urban settings, while little research has examined the effects on rural communities. This study investigated the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on livelihoods and food security in the rural area of Bushbuckridge, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. We utilized a panel data set comprising 454 households from the Sustainability in Communal Socio-Ecological Systems (SUCSES) survey, conducted in 2019 and 2021. To identify the determinants of food security over time, we employed difference-in-differences (DiD) panel regression models for the two time periods, focusing on key indicators of food security, including household food availability, dietary diversity, food access, and overall food security. The analysis revealed significant adverse impacts of the lockdown on local off-farm employment ( p < 0.05). In response, households increased their reliance on subsistence agriculture and natural resource use as coping mechanisms. Contrary to expectations, food security metrics improved during the study period. Higher levels of food security were associated with migrant employment, domestic assets, and the use of edible wild fruits and vegetables. In contrast, a high dependency on social grants was correlated with lower food security levels. The study highlights the diverse coping mechanisms rural households employed to adapt to pandemic-related disruptions, underscoring the importance of livelihood diversification. While short-term improvements in food security were observed, the decline in local off-farm employment poses risks to long-term resilience. These findings emphasize the need for targeted policy interventions that support the diversified livelihoods of rural households while strengthening social protection systems to sustain food security beyond crisis periods.

Human EcologyVol. 53(2)
University of Idaho (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), University of Colorado System (US), Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance System (ZA)
Wellcome Trust, Department of Science and Innovation, South Africa, National Research Foundation, South African Medical Research Council, World Agroforestry Centre, Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.