Planning of the diagnostic experiment in the localization of troubleshooting failures of single-free systems

Formalized conditions for carrying out a diagnostic experiment associated with the identification of faulty fragments (subschemes) of inertial-free systems are obtained.The diagnostic experiment is reduced to computational procedures for localization of faulty subschemes, which are based on testing hypotheses that the characteristics of the allocated subschemes have changed.Hypotheses are formulated in such a way as to ensure the detection of parametric and structural faults.The first, for example, may include changing the resistance of the circuit, and the second -an open or short circuit.When the system is divided into subschemes, the latter are selected from the condition of their parametric identifiably, i.e.The situation when, based on the known parameters of the remaining subschemes, as well as the input and output signals in the whole system, it is possible to determine the parameters of the subscheme under consideration.Planning a diagnostic experiment is as follows.Assuming a linear relationship between the parameters of the allocated subscheme i S and the output signals of the system, a verification matrix F is created in advance, which determines the interrelation of the indicated parameters and signals, considering the serviceability of the subscheme under consideration.In the event of a malfunction, the verification matrix F changes, which allows to determine the nonconformity matrix q , on the basis of which analysis it is possible to obtain an estimate i of the parameters i of the subscheme i S under consideration, as a result of which it is concluded that it is serviceable.Procedures for testing hypotheses on the health of the subschemes of the inertial-free system for cases of parametric and structural faults are of an identical nature.The principal difference between experiment planning and structural faults from planning for parametric faults is that for parametric faults the value i does not depend on the input signals of the system, while for structural faultsthe value i depends on the input signals of the system, in an unknown way.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
INFORMATICS AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN SIMULATION
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15276/imms.v15.no2.166
Primary Topic
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Planning of the diagnostic experiment in the localization of troubleshooting failures of single-free systems

А. А. Савельев, L.L. Prokofieva
INFORMATICS AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN SIMULATION
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
article

Planning of the diagnostic experiment in the localization of troubleshooting failures of single-free systems

А. А. Савельев, L.L. Prokofieva
article en

Abstract

Formalized conditions for carrying out a diagnostic experiment associated with the identification of faulty fragments (subschemes) of inertial-free systems are obtained.The diagnostic experiment is reduced to computational procedures for localization of faulty subschemes, which are based on testing hypotheses that the characteristics of the allocated subschemes have changed.Hypotheses are formulated in such a way as to ensure the detection of parametric and structural faults.The first, for example, may include changing the resistance of the circuit, and the second -an open or short circuit.When the system is divided into subschemes, the latter are selected from the condition of their parametric identifiably, i.e.The situation when, based on the known parameters of the remaining subschemes, as well as the input and output signals in the whole system, it is possible to determine the parameters of the subscheme under consideration.Planning a diagnostic experiment is as follows.Assuming a linear relationship between the parameters of the allocated subscheme i S and the output signals of the system, a verification matrix F is created in advance, which determines the interrelation of the indicated parameters and signals, considering the serviceability of the subscheme under consideration.In the event of a malfunction, the verification matrix F changes, which allows to determine the nonconformity matrix q , on the basis of which analysis it is possible to obtain an estimate i of the parameters i of the subscheme i S under consideration, as a result of which it is concluded that it is serviceable.Procedures for testing hypotheses on the health of the subschemes of the inertial-free system for cases of parametric and structural faults are of an identical nature.The principal difference between experiment planning and structural faults from planning for parametric faults is that for parametric faults the value i does not depend on the input signals of the system, while for structural faultsthe value i depends on the input signals of the system, in an unknown way.

INFORMATICS AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN SIMULATIONVol. 15(2)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.