Evaluating the Unconfined Compressive Strength Retention of Corn Starch Stabilized Lateritic Soils

This study evaluates the effectiveness of corn starch as a sustainable stabilizer for lateritic soils, focusing on unconfined compressive strength (UCS) retention under wet–dry cycles. A (3,2) Scheffé simplex lattice design was employed to vary lateritic soil, corn starch, and water-to-solids (w/s) ratio across 12 mixes (6 trial, 6 control). Samples were cured for 28 days, then subjected to 12 wet–dry cycles to assess UCS retention. UCS retention ranged from 69.68% to 90.12% for trial mixes and 69.68% to 91.24% for control mixes, indicating strong durability. The best-performing mixes exceeded 90%, confirming corn starch’s potential for long-term stabilization. The Scheffé regression model developed had an R² of 0.998 and an F-value of 1.056 (< F-critical of 5.05), confirming predictive reliability and statistical adequacy. Model coefficients showed corn starch had the greatest influence (β₂ = 87.50), followed by lateritic soil (β₁ = 83.33) and water-to-solids ratio (β₃ = 69.68). Positive interactions between lateritic soil and corn starch (18.82) and between lateritic soil and water-to-solids ratio (43.98) improved retention, while a slight negative effect between corn starch and water-to-solids ratio (−0.72) indicated that excess water could reduce binding. Overall, corn starch significantly improves UCS retention, offering a durable, eco-friendly solution for lateritic soil stabilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Research and Reports
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2025/v27i71577
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Unconfined Compressive Strength Retention of Corn Starch Stabilized Lateritic Soils

D.B. Eme, Ohwerhi Kelly Erhiferhi, Worlu Bright
Journal of Engineering Research and Reports
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Evaluating the Unconfined Compressive Strength Retention of Corn Starch Stabilized Lateritic Soils

D.B. Eme, Ohwerhi Kelly Erhiferhi, Worlu Bright
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of corn starch as a sustainable stabilizer for lateritic soils, focusing on unconfined compressive strength (UCS) retention under wet–dry cycles. A (3,2) Scheffé simplex lattice design was employed to vary lateritic soil, corn starch, and water-to-solids (w/s) ratio across 12 mixes (6 trial, 6 control). Samples were cured for 28 days, then subjected to 12 wet–dry cycles to assess UCS retention. UCS retention ranged from 69.68% to 90.12% for trial mixes and 69.68% to 91.24% for control mixes, indicating strong durability. The best-performing mixes exceeded 90%, confirming corn starch’s potential for long-term stabilization. The Scheffé regression model developed had an R² of 0.998 and an F-value of 1.056 (< F-critical of 5.05), confirming predictive reliability and statistical adequacy. Model coefficients showed corn starch had the greatest influence (β₂ = 87.50), followed by lateritic soil (β₁ = 83.33) and water-to-solids ratio (β₃ = 69.68). Positive interactions between lateritic soil and corn starch (18.82) and between lateritic soil and water-to-solids ratio (43.98) improved retention, while a slight negative effect between corn starch and water-to-solids ratio (−0.72) indicated that excess water could reduce binding. Overall, corn starch significantly improves UCS retention, offering a durable, eco-friendly solution for lateritic soil stabilization.

Journal of Engineering Research and ReportsVol. 27(7)
University of Port Harcourt (NG), Rivers State University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.