Material-mediated pyrogens in medical devices: Myth or reality?_suppl1

Annex G of ISO 10993-11:2017 lists 24 substances that are allegedly material-mediated pyrogens (MMPs) in medical devices and recommends using the rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) for MMP evaluation. We aimed to establish whether medical devices contain MMPs; determine if MMPs are pyrogens or uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation (UOPs); complete a survey of RPT failures; and develop a UOP screening list. A literature search was conducted to identify MMPs associated with medical devices. Concurrently, data mining was conducted to search for MMPs in medical device extractables databases and collect RPT data from industry and contract research labs. The literature search produced the conclusions: (1) Annex G’s endogenous biological compounds are pyrogenic; (2) Annex G’s drugs and UOP substances are not pyrogenic but thermogenic; (3) numerous other UOPs were identified; and (4) nearly all UOPs are poorly soluble in saline (the RPT’s injection solvent). The data mining found two Annex G MMPs in medical device extracts that were not pyrogenic and confirmed that the RPT failure rate was low, with investigated failures caused by endotoxin or test incompatibilities, not by Annex G MMPs. Since no pyrogenic Annex G MMPs or saline soluble UOPs were found in medical device extracts, the RPT is unnecessary. If UOPs are detected during chemical characterization studies, an ISO 10993-17:2023 toxicological risk assessment can be used to determine their hazard potential. Residual biological contamination can be evaluated with the human monocyte activation test, which detects all biological pyrogens. The term “MMP” is inaccurate and obsolete. Plain language summary Pyrogens cause fevers in mammals. Medical devices contaminated with bacterial components or chemicals generate a material-mediated pyrogenic (MMP) response. The rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) is used to detect MMPs even though its accuracy is questionable. An international standard lists 24 chemicals that are alleged to be medical device MMPs. To evaluate this belief, a search of the scientific literature was conducted to identify MMPs associated with medical devices along with a data mining effort that searched for MMPs found by chemistry laboratories that test medical devices. Failure rates for the RPT were also studied. Only two of the 24 chemicals were found in medical devices, and they were not pyrogens, plus the RPT failures were not due to MMPs. It was concluded that MMPs do not exist and therefore the RPT could be replaced with a human blood cell test that detects all types of biological pyrogens.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ALTEX
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2504231s1
Primary Topic
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Material-mediated pyrogens in medical devices: Myth or reality?_suppl1

ALTEX
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
article

Material-mediated pyrogens in medical devices: Myth or reality?_suppl1

article en

Abstract

Annex G of ISO 10993-11:2017 lists 24 substances that are allegedly material-mediated pyrogens (MMPs) in medical devices and recommends using the rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) for MMP evaluation. We aimed to establish whether medical devices contain MMPs; determine if MMPs are pyrogens or uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation (UOPs); complete a survey of RPT failures; and develop a UOP screening list. A literature search was conducted to identify MMPs associated with medical devices. Concurrently, data mining was conducted to search for MMPs in medical device extractables databases and collect RPT data from industry and contract research labs. The literature search produced the conclusions: (1) Annex G’s endogenous biological compounds are pyrogenic; (2) Annex G’s drugs and UOP substances are not pyrogenic but thermogenic; (3) numerous other UOPs were identified; and (4) nearly all UOPs are poorly soluble in saline (the RPT’s injection solvent). The data mining found two Annex G MMPs in medical device extracts that were not pyrogenic and confirmed that the RPT failure rate was low, with investigated failures caused by endotoxin or test incompatibilities, not by Annex G MMPs. Since no pyrogenic Annex G MMPs or saline soluble UOPs were found in medical device extracts, the RPT is unnecessary. If UOPs are detected during chemical characterization studies, an ISO 10993-17:2023 toxicological risk assessment can be used to determine their hazard potential. Residual biological contamination can be evaluated with the human monocyte activation test, which detects all biological pyrogens. The term “MMP” is inaccurate and obsolete. Plain language summary Pyrogens cause fevers in mammals. Medical devices contaminated with bacterial components or chemicals generate a material-mediated pyrogenic (MMP) response. The rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) is used to detect MMPs even though its accuracy is questionable. An international standard lists 24 chemicals that are alleged to be medical device MMPs. To evaluate this belief, a search of the scientific literature was conducted to identify MMPs associated with medical devices along with a data mining effort that searched for MMPs found by chemistry laboratories that test medical devices. Failure rates for the RPT were also studied. Only two of the 24 chemicals were found in medical devices, and they were not pyrogens, plus the RPT failures were not due to MMPs. It was concluded that MMPs do not exist and therefore the RPT could be replaced with a human blood cell test that detects all types of biological pyrogens.

ALTEX
Medtronic (United States) (US), Gradient (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.