Penal Policy on Families of Imprisoned People—An Impossible Situation? <i>Understanding Scottish Prison Policy Through Prison Staff’s Moral Sensibilities</i>

Abstract Scottish penal policy emphasizes the rights and well-being of the families of imprisoned people, yet reports suggest persistent gaps between discourse and practice. This paper examines prison staff’s moral sensibilities regarding families. Using Zacka’s Street-Level Bureaucracy framework, it links staff moral distress to a misalignment between policy aspirations to support families and other institutional policies and characteristics that, in practice, harm them. Through this analysis, I recast the gap between discourse and practice not as an implementation issue, but as a consequence of moral incoherence in the state's position on families which, left unresolved upstream, is effectively delegated to prison staff. The paper has implications for penal policymaking and prison governance and advances a methodological argument for prison staff-focused research as a form of policy analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Criminology
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaf054
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Penal Policy on Families of Imprisoned People—An Impossible Situation? Understanding Scottish Prison Policy Through Prison Staff’s Moral Sensibilities

Rikki Wolkind
The British Journal of Criminology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Penal Policy on Families of Imprisoned People—An Impossible Situation? Understanding Scottish Prison Policy Through Prison Staff’s Moral Sensibilities

Rikki Wolkind
article en

Abstract

Abstract Scottish penal policy emphasizes the rights and well-being of the families of imprisoned people, yet reports suggest persistent gaps between discourse and practice. This paper examines prison staff’s moral sensibilities regarding families. Using Zacka’s Street-Level Bureaucracy framework, it links staff moral distress to a misalignment between policy aspirations to support families and other institutional policies and characteristics that, in practice, harm them. Through this analysis, I recast the gap between discourse and practice not as an implementation issue, but as a consequence of moral incoherence in the state's position on families which, left unresolved upstream, is effectively delegated to prison staff. The paper has implications for penal policymaking and prison governance and advances a methodological argument for prison staff-focused research as a form of policy analysis.

The British Journal of Criminology
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.