Inclusive Teaching in Intermediate Microeconomics: All Flowers, No Weeds in the Hardest Core Class

Intermediate microeconomics is often considered a “weed-out” class that winnows economics majors down to those who can cut it in the tough field of economics. We argue that this mindset unnecessarily gatekeeps economics and that all students should be seen as flowers to be cultivated. We suggest strategies for teaching this course in an inclusive yet rigorous way. First, we discuss sense of belonging, economics identity, active support of students, and student growth mindset. Next, we discuss assessment of students’ quantitative preparation and support of students with weaker math backgrounds. We then encourage active learning, providing specific example activities. We discuss how the material, which can seem abstract, can be made relevant and compelling to undergraduates, including those from underrepresented backgrounds. Finally, we discuss the importance of instructors’ growth mindset with regard to students and the value of communicating the belief that all students can succeed in the course.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Economist
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/05694345251353133
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusive Teaching in Intermediate Microeconomics: All Flowers, No Weeds in the Hardest Core Class

Sarah Jacobson, Angelino Viceisza
1 citations
The American Economist
Innovations in Educational Methods
8.93
article

Inclusive Teaching in Intermediate Microeconomics: All Flowers, No Weeds in the Hardest Core Class

Sarah Jacobson, Angelino Viceisza
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Intermediate microeconomics is often considered a “weed-out” class that winnows economics majors down to those who can cut it in the tough field of economics. We argue that this mindset unnecessarily gatekeeps economics and that all students should be seen as flowers to be cultivated. We suggest strategies for teaching this course in an inclusive yet rigorous way. First, we discuss sense of belonging, economics identity, active support of students, and student growth mindset. Next, we discuss assessment of students’ quantitative preparation and support of students with weaker math backgrounds. We then encourage active learning, providing specific example activities. We discuss how the material, which can seem abstract, can be made relevant and compelling to undergraduates, including those from underrepresented backgrounds. Finally, we discuss the importance of instructors’ growth mindset with regard to students and the value of communicating the belief that all students can succeed in the course.

The American EconomistVol. 70(2)
Spelman College (US), Williams College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovations in Educational Methods
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.