Can a Single Strand of Hair Contaminate a Surgical Instrument Set? A Controlled Experimental Study

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Surgical site infections account for a substantial proportion of hospital-acquired infections, and the proper sterilization of surgical instruments is crucial for their prevention. Hair strands detected in sterile surgical sets are generally considered sufficient grounds for rejection, leading to delays in surgical procedures. The present study evaluates the impact of hair strands on the efficacy of sterilization and the potential for contamination. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> This controlled experimental study was conducted in the sterilization unit of a public hospital in Istanbul between January 15 and February 15, 2023. It was hypothesized that no microbial growth would occur in hair strands or on surgical instruments after sterilization, regardless of the contamination status or sterilization method. The surgical sets obtained for the study were divided into three groups: experiment group 1, to which uncontaminated hair strands were applied (n = 6); experiment group 2, to which hair strands contaminated with one of five bacterial pathogens were applied (<i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, <i>Candida albicans</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>; n = 30); and the control group, to which no hair strands were applied (n = 6). The soft tissue surgical instruments in each group were standardized by weight (3-3.5 kg) and sterilized using one of three methods: pressurized steam, ethylene oxide, or hydrogen peroxide. After sterilization, microbiological samples were collected by culturing swabs from the hair strands and surgical instruments under appropriate conditions in tryptic soy broth and various agar media. <b><i>Results:</i></b> No microbial growth was observed in any group after sterilization, regardless of the presence or contamination of hair strands or the sterilization method used. The biological indicators also identified no growth after sterilization. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The present highlights the effectiveness of proper sterilization techniques, even in the presence of hair strands, and suggests that hair should not be treated as a potential source of contamination in all surgical settings. It should be noted, however, that the present study was conducted under controlled clinical microbiology laboratory conditions and so does not consider the complexity and variability of clinical environments. Surgical units should thus be encouraged to replicate these data or carry out similar studies and revise their practices based on their own results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Infections
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10962964251359184
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can a Single Strand of Hair Contaminate a Surgical Instrument Set? A Controlled Experimental Study

Hamdiye Banu Katran, Sevgi Gür, Zeynep Çizmeci, Nurgül Arpag
Surgical Infections
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Can a Single Strand of Hair Contaminate a Surgical Instrument Set? A Controlled Experimental Study

Hamdiye Banu Katran, Sevgi Gür, Zeynep Çizmeci, Nurgül Arpag
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Surgical site infections account for a substantial proportion of hospital-acquired infections, and the proper sterilization of surgical instruments is crucial for their prevention. Hair strands detected in sterile surgical sets are generally considered sufficient grounds for rejection, leading to delays in surgical procedures. The present study evaluates the impact of hair strands on the efficacy of sterilization and the potential for contamination. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> This controlled experimental study was conducted in the sterilization unit of a public hospital in Istanbul between January 15 and February 15, 2023. It was hypothesized that no microbial growth would occur in hair strands or on surgical instruments after sterilization, regardless of the contamination status or sterilization method. The surgical sets obtained for the study were divided into three groups: experiment group 1, to which uncontaminated hair strands were applied (n = 6); experiment group 2, to which hair strands contaminated with one of five bacterial pathogens were applied (<i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, <i>Candida albicans</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>; n = 30); and the control group, to which no hair strands were applied (n = 6). The soft tissue surgical instruments in each group were standardized by weight (3-3.5 kg) and sterilized using one of three methods: pressurized steam, ethylene oxide, or hydrogen peroxide. After sterilization, microbiological samples were collected by culturing swabs from the hair strands and surgical instruments under appropriate conditions in tryptic soy broth and various agar media. <b><i>Results:</i></b> No microbial growth was observed in any group after sterilization, regardless of the presence or contamination of hair strands or the sterilization method used. The biological indicators also identified no growth after sterilization. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The present highlights the effectiveness of proper sterilization techniques, even in the presence of hair strands, and suggests that hair should not be treated as a potential source of contamination in all surgical settings. It should be noted, however, that the present study was conducted under controlled clinical microbiology laboratory conditions and so does not consider the complexity and variability of clinical environments. Surgical units should thus be encouraged to replicate these data or carry out similar studies and revise their practices based on their own results.

Surgical InfectionsVol. 26(10)
Selçuk University (TR), Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Atlas Üniversitesi, Istanbul Arel University (TR), Marmara University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.