Revisiting Juan José Saer’s El entenado / The Witness —Forty Years Later

Abstract: This essay revisits Juan José Saer’s 1983 novel El entenado/The Witness as a novel, as a work of the literary imagination, for the purpose of challenging the thrust of scholarship that reads it, not as fiction, but as faulty ethnography and historiography and therefore a palimpsest of racist-colonialist tropes about the “cannibal” in the Americas. Saer’s novel bears “witness” to the emergence of “scientific” discourses of human communities in early modernity through its mimicry of the ethnographic mode, but the novel’s fictional and literary properties subvert—rather than reinforce—those very discourses. This is accomplished by the novel’s unnamed narrator in sixteenth-century Spain who retrospectively narrates the ten years he spent in captivity with a cannibalistic society somewhere in South America and became immersed in their community. His account is a self-reflexive meditation on the failure of language to signify as well as the irretrievability and capriciousness of memory. It also implicates the myopic nature of sixteenth-century European thought about its historical “others.”

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modern Literature
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2979/jml.00083
Primary Topic
Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Juan José Saer’s El entenado / The Witness —Forty Years Later

Emad Mirmotahari
Journal of Modern Literature
Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
article

Revisiting Juan José Saer’s El entenado / The Witness —Forty Years Later

Emad Mirmotahari
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This essay revisits Juan José Saer’s 1983 novel El entenado/The Witness as a novel, as a work of the literary imagination, for the purpose of challenging the thrust of scholarship that reads it, not as fiction, but as faulty ethnography and historiography and therefore a palimpsest of racist-colonialist tropes about the “cannibal” in the Americas. Saer’s novel bears “witness” to the emergence of “scientific” discourses of human communities in early modernity through its mimicry of the ethnographic mode, but the novel’s fictional and literary properties subvert—rather than reinforce—those very discourses. This is accomplished by the novel’s unnamed narrator in sixteenth-century Spain who retrospectively narrates the ten years he spent in captivity with a cannibalistic society somewhere in South America and became immersed in their community. His account is a self-reflexive meditation on the failure of language to signify as well as the irretrievability and capriciousness of memory. It also implicates the myopic nature of sixteenth-century European thought about its historical “others.”

Journal of Modern LiteratureVol. 48(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.