Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification for Focused Ultrasound Breast Cancer Therapies Using Reduced Order Models

Focused ultrasound (FUS) is a thermal therapy used to noninvasively destroy diseased tissues. Computational tools are being explored to plan faster, safer, and more effective focused ultrasound treatments by using simulations to predict their outcomes. For simulations to be used with confidence, the uncertainties in their predicted outcomes must be characterized. This is challenging because the simulations have a large computational cost and performing uncertainty quantification (UQ) typically requires evaluating the simulations many times. Multifidelity uncertainty quantification uses techniques that aim to reduce the computational cost of uncertainty quantification. This is done by combining results from computationally expensive and accurate high-fidelity models with lower-fidelity models that sacrifice some accuracy to reduce computational expense. In this work, a multifidelity uncertainty quantification technique using projection-based reduced order models (ROMs) as the low-fidelity model is used on thermal simulations of two focused ultrasound sonications performed as part of breast cancer treatments. The errors in mean response estimates of multiple quantities of interest (QoIs) using this multifidelity uncertainty quantification technique are compared against those using traditional Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification. The mean, standard deviation, and skewness estimated using the multifidelity and Monte Carlo techniques are fit to Pearson Type III distributions to compare their predictions of quantity of interest distributions. It is found that multifidelity uncertainty quantification predicts the mean response of the quantities of interest with up to 50% lower error while maintaining similar accuracy in distribution predictions when compared to Monte Carlo.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4069124
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification for Focused Ultrasound Breast Cancer Therapies Using Reduced Order Models

Jakob G. Bates, Christopher R. Dillon, John Tencer, Matthew R. Jones
ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification for Focused Ultrasound Breast Cancer Therapies Using Reduced Order Models

Jakob G. Bates, Christopher R. Dillon, John Tencer, Matthew R. Jones
article en

Abstract

Focused ultrasound (FUS) is a thermal therapy used to noninvasively destroy diseased tissues. Computational tools are being explored to plan faster, safer, and more effective focused ultrasound treatments by using simulations to predict their outcomes. For simulations to be used with confidence, the uncertainties in their predicted outcomes must be characterized. This is challenging because the simulations have a large computational cost and performing uncertainty quantification (UQ) typically requires evaluating the simulations many times. Multifidelity uncertainty quantification uses techniques that aim to reduce the computational cost of uncertainty quantification. This is done by combining results from computationally expensive and accurate high-fidelity models with lower-fidelity models that sacrifice some accuracy to reduce computational expense. In this work, a multifidelity uncertainty quantification technique using projection-based reduced order models (ROMs) as the low-fidelity model is used on thermal simulations of two focused ultrasound sonications performed as part of breast cancer treatments. The errors in mean response estimates of multiple quantities of interest (QoIs) using this multifidelity uncertainty quantification technique are compared against those using traditional Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification. The mean, standard deviation, and skewness estimated using the multifidelity and Monte Carlo techniques are fit to Pearson Type III distributions to compare their predictions of quantity of interest distributions. It is found that multifidelity uncertainty quantification predicts the mean response of the quantities of interest with up to 50% lower error while maintaining similar accuracy in distribution predictions when compared to Monte Carlo.

ASME Journal of Heat and Mass TransferVol. 147(12)
Brigham Young University (US), Sandia National Laboratories California (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.