The Place of Research in the Professional Identity of Practitioners and Managers in Adult Social Care

The nature of professional identity in the roles of practitioners in social care is not clearly defined. This article uses baseline data from a study seeking to increase the use of research in decision‐making within adult social care to discuss the role of research in the professional identity of social care practitioners. Semistructured interviews were completed with 25 members of staff working in adult social care in the UK, employing purposive sampling to ensure representation across various professional roles and seniority levels. The interviews explored participants’ perspectives on research, its role in their practice, and factors influencing engagement with research. Following thematic analysis of the interview transcripts, results revealed diverse views among social care professionals regarding the use of research in their daily work. Occupational therapists characterised their practice as ‘evidence‐based’ and discussed differences between the use of research in social care compared to in health settings. Social workers voiced a range of opinions, with some considering research integral to social work practice, while others viewing it as a separate, academic task. Experience was valued over research by some participants, suggesting a shift in views among professionals over the course of their careers. Research was not considered a core component of the role of nonprofessionally qualified staff. Senior leaders were expected to engage more with research, yet practical demands often limited their involvement. The role of principal social workers and principal occupational therapists emerged as critical in championing research across the workforce, but concerns were raised about fostering a culture of dependency on these leaders for research dissemination. The article concludes by highlighting the need for a comprehensive development program promoting research engagement at all levels within social care organizations to bridge the gap between research and evidence‐based decision‐making.