Ukraine’s Policy in the Caspian Region in 1991–2024: From Multi-Vector to Crisis

Ukraine’s post-Soviet foreign policy in the Caspian region is reflected in doctrines, bilateral and multilateral agreements, and statutory documents, as well as in the actual steps performed by the country in this direction in 1991–2024. The article describes various aspects of the Caspian vector, e.g., regional priorities, local and international institutions, and areas of interaction (energy, logistics, etc.). The authors combined the principles of historicism and objectivity with the middle range theory and Stephen Krasner’s regime theory to conduct a comparative historical and chronological study of political documents and actual results. Ukraine could have become a link between the entire Caspian region or some of its states and the rest of the world, thus catalyzing the development of a prosperous Black Sea-Caspian region. However, it either missed these opportunities or failed to implement them. The reasons included poorly strategized foreign policy, when the country dispersed its limited resources on a multi-vector course, replacing its actual interests with abstract slogans about the European choice while choosing political conjuncture over long-term prospects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SibScript
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-3-541-551
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ukraine’s Policy in the Caspian Region in 1991–2024: From Multi-Vector to Crisis

D. Belashchenko, Имомидин Фозилович Шоджонов, Elizaveta O. Gudkova
SibScript
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

Ukraine’s Policy in the Caspian Region in 1991–2024: From Multi-Vector to Crisis

D. Belashchenko, Имомидин Фозилович Шоджонов, Elizaveta O. Gudkova
article en

Abstract

Ukraine’s post-Soviet foreign policy in the Caspian region is reflected in doctrines, bilateral and multilateral agreements, and statutory documents, as well as in the actual steps performed by the country in this direction in 1991–2024. The article describes various aspects of the Caspian vector, e.g., regional priorities, local and international institutions, and areas of interaction (energy, logistics, etc.). The authors combined the principles of historicism and objectivity with the middle range theory and Stephen Krasner’s regime theory to conduct a comparative historical and chronological study of political documents and actual results. Ukraine could have become a link between the entire Caspian region or some of its states and the rest of the world, thus catalyzing the development of a prosperous Black Sea-Caspian region. However, it either missed these opportunities or failed to implement them. The reasons included poorly strategized foreign policy, when the country dispersed its limited resources on a multi-vector course, replacing its actual interests with abstract slogans about the European choice while choosing political conjuncture over long-term prospects.

SibScriptVol. 27(3)
N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.