German coffee, predatory states, and selective property rights enforcement in 20th-century Guatemala

Abstract How do political leaders in states with limited institutional constraints enforce property rights? In 20th-century Guatemala, German coffee producers benefited from the country’s export-led growth policies—trade agreements, land grants, and infrastructure concessions that allowed them to become the primary producers of the country’s coffee. The security of their property rights depended on their contributions to government revenue through the production of coffee and customs duties. When contributions declined during both world wars, so did security of ownership, leading to two bouts of large-scale expropriation—during the dictatorships of Manuel Estrada (1898–1920) and Jorge Ubico (1931–44). Through a comparative analysis of the two regimes that draws from original qualitative and quantitative evidence, this article argues that political leaders limit expropriation to encourage production and maximize government revenue. However, when revenue falls below the expected gains from expropriation, the likelihood of state appropriation of property rights—whether through asset seizure or regulatory restrictions—increases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Choice
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-025-01312-2
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

German coffee, predatory states, and selective property rights enforcement in 20th-century Guatemala

Ricardo R. Noé
Public Choice
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

German coffee, predatory states, and selective property rights enforcement in 20th-century Guatemala

Ricardo R. Noé
article en

Abstract

Abstract How do political leaders in states with limited institutional constraints enforce property rights? In 20th-century Guatemala, German coffee producers benefited from the country’s export-led growth policies—trade agreements, land grants, and infrastructure concessions that allowed them to become the primary producers of the country’s coffee. The security of their property rights depended on their contributions to government revenue through the production of coffee and customs duties. When contributions declined during both world wars, so did security of ownership, leading to two bouts of large-scale expropriation—during the dictatorships of Manuel Estrada (1898–1920) and Jorge Ubico (1931–44). Through a comparative analysis of the two regimes that draws from original qualitative and quantitative evidence, this article argues that political leaders limit expropriation to encourage production and maximize government revenue. However, when revenue falls below the expected gains from expropriation, the likelihood of state appropriation of property rights—whether through asset seizure or regulatory restrictions—increases.

Public ChoiceVol. 206(1-2)
The University of Texas at Dallas (US), University of Houston - Downtown (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.