Parenting the State: A Constitutional Case for Parental Notification Policies in California School Districts

In July 2024, the State of California passed the Support Academic Futures & Educators for Today's Youth Act (SAFETY Act). This law prevents school districts from implementing policies that would require school personnel to disclose information related to a student's gender identity to their parents without that student’s consent. The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to consider the constitutionality of such a law and the parental notification policies it aims to invalidate. In light of U.S. Supreme Court precedent, this note will argue for the unconstitutionality of the SAFETY Act and the constitutionality of parental notification policies by primarily utilizing the Washington v. Glucksberg analysis and the presumption that parents possess their child's best interest as established in Parham v. J.R.

Publication Details

Journal
Helms School of Government Undergraduate Law Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70623/ziwt7518
Primary Topic
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parenting the State: A Constitutional Case for Parental Notification Policies in California School Districts

Helms School of Government Undergraduate Law Review
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
article

Parenting the State: A Constitutional Case for Parental Notification Policies in California School Districts

article en

Abstract

In July 2024, the State of California passed the Support Academic Futures & Educators for Today's Youth Act (SAFETY Act). This law prevents school districts from implementing policies that would require school personnel to disclose information related to a student's gender identity to their parents without that student’s consent. The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to consider the constitutionality of such a law and the parental notification policies it aims to invalidate. In light of U.S. Supreme Court precedent, this note will argue for the unconstitutionality of the SAFETY Act and the constitutionality of parental notification policies by primarily utilizing the Washington v. Glucksberg analysis and the presumption that parents possess their child's best interest as established in Parham v. J.R.

Helms School of Government Undergraduate Law ReviewVol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.