Engaging with justice in integrated landscape approaches

Climate and biodiversity crises, conflicts over access to land, water, or food, multiple and overlapping types of land management and livelihoods are some of the players that describe current landscape challenges worldwide. It has been broadly acknowledged that addressing interconnected social and ecological challenges needs integrated solutions at landscape scale. Integrated landscape approaches (ILAs) are governance strategies that deal with these complex social and ecological challenges. Yet, many of these governance strategies lack a nuanced attention to the injustices that manifest themselves in landscape governance, use, and management. These injustices influence the strategies chosen and how they can be reached. In this synthesis, we first identify the injustices that can appear in, and shape a given landscape, empirically illustrating how ILAs can relate to multiple dimensions of justice. We highlight methods suitable for studying injustices in landscapes from an academic perspective. Later, we share and reflect about our positionality, and our experiences of struggling, in harnessing a more transgressive science that engages with landscape justice. We argue that identifying, understanding, and reflecting on how to address injustice in landscape research should become a crucial step in implementing ILAs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Society
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5751/es-16265-300306
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging with justice in integrated landscape approaches

Gonzalo Cortés‐Capano, Claudia Heindorf, Marion Jay, Lukas Flinzberger et al.
3 citations
Ecology and Society
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
7.27
article

Engaging with justice in integrated landscape approaches

Gonzalo Cortés‐Capano, Claudia Heindorf, Marion Jay, Lukas Flinzberger, Pramila Thapa, Brianne A. Altmann, Koushik Chowdhury, Noelia Zafra‐Calvo, Laura Kmoch, Kamila Svobodová, Abul Bashar Polas, Tobias Plieninger, Janina Huber
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Climate and biodiversity crises, conflicts over access to land, water, or food, multiple and overlapping types of land management and livelihoods are some of the players that describe current landscape challenges worldwide. It has been broadly acknowledged that addressing interconnected social and ecological challenges needs integrated solutions at landscape scale. Integrated landscape approaches (ILAs) are governance strategies that deal with these complex social and ecological challenges. Yet, many of these governance strategies lack a nuanced attention to the injustices that manifest themselves in landscape governance, use, and management. These injustices influence the strategies chosen and how they can be reached. In this synthesis, we first identify the injustices that can appear in, and shape a given landscape, empirically illustrating how ILAs can relate to multiple dimensions of justice. We highlight methods suitable for studying injustices in landscapes from an academic perspective. Later, we share and reflect about our positionality, and our experiences of struggling, in harnessing a more transgressive science that engages with landscape justice. We argue that identifying, understanding, and reflecting on how to address injustice in landscape research should become a crucial step in implementing ILAs.

Ecology and SocietyVol. 30(3)
Biodiversa+, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
7.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.