Reconceptualising the Cyclical Process in Participatory Action Research: A Focus on the Individual-Collective Dynamics

This article proposes a new multi-helix model for Participatory Action Research (PAR) to capture the individual-collective dynamics in the cyclical process. By offering a critique of Lewin’s traditional action-reflection cycle, we outline the dangers of assuming synchronicity between the ‘individual’ and the ‘collective’ and the reflection-action linearity pervasive to existing PAR cycles. We draw on the authors’ experiences of carrying out PAR in various cultural, social and professional contexts to explore (mis)aligned rates and weights of participation, considering these alongside temporality and materiality within the PAR process. We argue that collective reflective practice is the site of both the performance and the construction of the collective, which benefit from embracing individuals’ changing concerns and life projects. Informed by the work of Archer (2000, 2007) and Schatzki (2009, 2017), the proposed model harnesses PAR’s potential for democratising knowledge production by exposing the social and emotional work carried out by participatory researchers, evoking timely implications for a practice turn in PAR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251346262
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconceptualising the Cyclical Process in Participatory Action Research: A Focus on the Individual-Collective Dynamics

Catrin Noone, Sui-Ting Kong
1 citations
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Participatory Visual Research Methods
4.20
article

Reconceptualising the Cyclical Process in Participatory Action Research: A Focus on the Individual-Collective Dynamics

Catrin Noone, Sui-Ting Kong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article proposes a new multi-helix model for Participatory Action Research (PAR) to capture the individual-collective dynamics in the cyclical process. By offering a critique of Lewin’s traditional action-reflection cycle, we outline the dangers of assuming synchronicity between the ‘individual’ and the ‘collective’ and the reflection-action linearity pervasive to existing PAR cycles. We draw on the authors’ experiences of carrying out PAR in various cultural, social and professional contexts to explore (mis)aligned rates and weights of participation, considering these alongside temporality and materiality within the PAR process. We argue that collective reflective practice is the site of both the performance and the construction of the collective, which benefit from embracing individuals’ changing concerns and life projects. Informed by the work of Archer (2000, 2007) and Schatzki (2009, 2017), the proposed model harnesses PAR’s potential for democratising knowledge production by exposing the social and emotional work carried out by participatory researchers, evoking timely implications for a practice turn in PAR.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 24
Durham University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reconceptualising the Cyclical Process in Participatory Action Research: A Focus on the Individual-Collective Dynamics — Catrin Noone, Sui-Ting Kong · International Journal of Qualitative Methods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS