Comparative Study of Adversarial Image Attacks

Adversarial attacks exploit subtle input modifications to mislead deep neural networks (DNNs), posing significant risks to critical applications like autonomous vehicles and medical imaging. This study examines adversarial image generation using methods such as Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), DeepFool, and Carlini & Wagner (C&W) attacks to assess DNN robustness. This approach involves generating adversarial samples with controlled perturbations and evaluating their impact on model performance. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of adversarial risks and pave the way for more resilient AI systems capable of withstanding deceptive inputs in real-world applications. The results highlight FGSM's efficiency in rapid perturbation generation, DeepFool's minimal iterative modifications, and C& W's optimized, imperceptible attacks, all of which significantly reduce model accuracy

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iceccc65144.2025.11063842
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Adversarial Image Attacks

Suja Palaniswamy, Angel Jean Vincy K, T. Sudeep Reddy
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Comparative Study of Adversarial Image Attacks

Suja Palaniswamy, Angel Jean Vincy K, T. Sudeep Reddy
article en

Abstract

Adversarial attacks exploit subtle input modifications to mislead deep neural networks (DNNs), posing significant risks to critical applications like autonomous vehicles and medical imaging. This study examines adversarial image generation using methods such as Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), DeepFool, and Carlini & Wagner (C&W) attacks to assess DNN robustness. This approach involves generating adversarial samples with controlled perturbations and evaluating their impact on model performance. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of adversarial risks and pave the way for more resilient AI systems capable of withstanding deceptive inputs in real-world applications. The results highlight FGSM's efficiency in rapid perturbation generation, DeepFool's minimal iterative modifications, and C& W's optimized, imperceptible attacks, all of which significantly reduce model accuracy

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.