Prosecuting Politicians

The laws of many countries grant politicians special protection from prosecution before national courts. The content of such laws is usually regulated by a compromise between two conflicting goals: On the one hand, the principle that everyone is equal before the law should be upheld. On the other hand, because politicians cannot fully dedicate themselves to their office when they are subject to legal proceedings, they should be protected more than regular citizens. What many seem to take for granted is that a trial of a senior politician, such as a prime minister or a president, does bad things to society. It deepens divisions between citizens and increases polarization in a way that is unhealthy for the democratic process. This Article seeks to challenge that intuition. Based on a series of comparative examples, the Article argues that prosecuting politicians improves public deliberation by getting people who would otherwise not engage in politics to take part in the political debate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-09-18
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prosecuting Politicians

Shai Dothan
eYLS (Yale Law School)
International Law and Human Rights
article

Prosecuting Politicians

Shai Dothan
article en

Abstract

The laws of many countries grant politicians special protection from prosecution before national courts. The content of such laws is usually regulated by a compromise between two conflicting goals: On the one hand, the principle that everyone is equal before the law should be upheld. On the other hand, because politicians cannot fully dedicate themselves to their office when they are subject to legal proceedings, they should be protected more than regular citizens. What many seem to take for granted is that a trial of a senior politician, such as a prime minister or a president, does bad things to society. It deepens divisions between citizens and increases polarization in a way that is unhealthy for the democratic process. This Article seeks to challenge that intuition. Based on a series of comparative examples, the Article argues that prosecuting politicians improves public deliberation by getting people who would otherwise not engage in politics to take part in the political debate.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Centre for International Governance Innovation (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.