The Current Ratio non-sense paradox - and how to fix it.

We aim for presenting a theoretical stringent version of the common current ratio.Existing accounting regulation prescribes using the going concern concept perspective and provides the measurement basis for a company's current assets and current liabilities, that make it questionable what is measured by the current ratio.Thus, we suggest using fair value as a common measurement basis for this ratio, since stringent use of fair value and fair value proxies provides adjusted current ratio values that differ from traditional current ratio values, but in return the conclusions based on the numbers are concise, understandable, reliable, and theoretically credible, no matter whether we use a normative or positive approach in our financial analysis.Our suggestion is a unique modification which eliminates a theoretical lapsus, and thus improves financial analysis since it is easily adapted by analysts using normative current ratio heuristics to the benefit of all accounting users seeking faithful information on companies' financial health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Current Ratio non-sense paradox - and how to fix it.

Finn Schøler
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

The Current Ratio non-sense paradox - and how to fix it.

Finn Schøler
article en

Abstract

We aim for presenting a theoretical stringent version of the common current ratio.Existing accounting regulation prescribes using the going concern concept perspective and provides the measurement basis for a company's current assets and current liabilities, that make it questionable what is measured by the current ratio.Thus, we suggest using fair value as a common measurement basis for this ratio, since stringent use of fair value and fair value proxies provides adjusted current ratio values that differ from traditional current ratio values, but in return the conclusions based on the numbers are concise, understandable, reliable, and theoretically credible, no matter whether we use a normative or positive approach in our financial analysis.Our suggestion is a unique modification which eliminates a theoretical lapsus, and thus improves financial analysis since it is easily adapted by analysts using normative current ratio heuristics to the benefit of all accounting users seeking faithful information on companies' financial health.

Aarhus University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Current Ratio non-sense paradox - and how to fix it. — Finn Schøler · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS