Social Foundations of Explanatory Models in Oocyte Donation

This article explores social contexts surrounding the decision to become an oocyte donor. As the core analytical category, the authors employ the concept of explanatory models, which helps overcome the excessive psychologism of the traditionally used term “motivation” in sociological research. This approach enables a deeper understanding of the contexts that create a framework of acceptability for the motives verbalized by donors. On the basis of a qualitative analysis of 29 interviews with potential oocyte donors conducted at a reproductive center in Yekaterinburg, Russia, during preparation for donation, we identify four explanatory models: stigmatization and anonymity, indifference of the immediate environment, female solidarity, and working through traumatic experiences. Each of these models contributes to the understanding of the donors’ actual motivations, given society’s ambivalent attitude toward commercial reproductive donation. In the context of latent stigmatization, women donors develop their own system of argumentation to justify their decisions, guided by values of altruism and mutual aid. At the same time, we note certain characteristics of the lives of Russian donors (such as challenging economic and housing situations, weak emotional ties with parents and partners, and traumatic experiences, including abortions) that may influence their willingness to donate. Article in Russian

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratorium Russian Review of Social Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53483/2078-1938-2025-17-1-147-175
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Foundations of Explanatory Models in Oocyte Donation

Laboratorium Russian Review of Social Research
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Social Foundations of Explanatory Models in Oocyte Donation

article en

Abstract

This article explores social contexts surrounding the decision to become an oocyte donor. As the core analytical category, the authors employ the concept of explanatory models, which helps overcome the excessive psychologism of the traditionally used term “motivation” in sociological research. This approach enables a deeper understanding of the contexts that create a framework of acceptability for the motives verbalized by donors. On the basis of a qualitative analysis of 29 interviews with potential oocyte donors conducted at a reproductive center in Yekaterinburg, Russia, during preparation for donation, we identify four explanatory models: stigmatization and anonymity, indifference of the immediate environment, female solidarity, and working through traumatic experiences. Each of these models contributes to the understanding of the donors’ actual motivations, given society’s ambivalent attitude toward commercial reproductive donation. In the context of latent stigmatization, women donors develop their own system of argumentation to justify their decisions, guided by values of altruism and mutual aid. At the same time, we note certain characteristics of the lives of Russian donors (such as challenging economic and housing situations, weak emotional ties with parents and partners, and traumatic experiences, including abortions) that may influence their willingness to donate. Article in Russian

Laboratorium Russian Review of Social ResearchVol. 17(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.