Sound Maps and Their Antinomies: From Listening Subject to Audible Objects

The article considers the heuristic and epistemological potential of the so-called sound maps. Sound maps are digital resources that allow any city actors to apply labels containing a sound recording of a selected location on the coordinate plane of a city. The purpose of creating such maps and their visual and audio content may vary in the course of filling the map with sound content. Users act here as a kind of “ethnographers of everyday life,” balancing between real and imaginary space. The distant view from above, allowing to cover a vast territory and forming a general idea of the represented area, discretizes the auditory dimension. The map has a certain degree of abstraction as significant fragments on it are highlighted by color, lines, texture, and symbols, while the rest of the space serves as a background or is absent. Due to internal demarcation and delineation by external boundaries, the user is positioned within the proposed “frame,” and sound reveals itself as antinomical, referring to the schematisms of sound perception and going beyond it simultaneously. Sound’s ability to communicate the specificities of space and to become a way of recording personal experience allows it to represent the audible “from the depth of the place” and to actualize the reduced and inaudible, while the use of other media (image, text, video) can hide the traces of mediation and immerse the user in the space of map and sound more fully. The ability of the sound signal to transcend boundaries, both landscape and cartographic, actualizes the question of what is on the “other side” of the map. The map takes the listening subject outward, while space holds it inward. In the case of sound maps, formed precisely as a result of this antinomic tension, in order to maintain epistemic parity and expand the field of possible cognitive operations, it makes sense to maintain a functional balance between the fullest possible disclosure of the content of the labels and the possibility of “hearing” these labels at a distance. Text in Russian

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratorium Russian Review of Social Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53483/2078-1938-2025-17-1-216-239
Primary Topic
Diverse Musicological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sound Maps and Their Antinomies: From Listening Subject to Audible Objects

Laboratorium Russian Review of Social Research
Diverse Musicological Studies
article

Sound Maps and Their Antinomies: From Listening Subject to Audible Objects

article en

Abstract

The article considers the heuristic and epistemological potential of the so-called sound maps. Sound maps are digital resources that allow any city actors to apply labels containing a sound recording of a selected location on the coordinate plane of a city. The purpose of creating such maps and their visual and audio content may vary in the course of filling the map with sound content. Users act here as a kind of “ethnographers of everyday life,” balancing between real and imaginary space. The distant view from above, allowing to cover a vast territory and forming a general idea of the represented area, discretizes the auditory dimension. The map has a certain degree of abstraction as significant fragments on it are highlighted by color, lines, texture, and symbols, while the rest of the space serves as a background or is absent. Due to internal demarcation and delineation by external boundaries, the user is positioned within the proposed “frame,” and sound reveals itself as antinomical, referring to the schematisms of sound perception and going beyond it simultaneously. Sound’s ability to communicate the specificities of space and to become a way of recording personal experience allows it to represent the audible “from the depth of the place” and to actualize the reduced and inaudible, while the use of other media (image, text, video) can hide the traces of mediation and immerse the user in the space of map and sound more fully. The ability of the sound signal to transcend boundaries, both landscape and cartographic, actualizes the question of what is on the “other side” of the map. The map takes the listening subject outward, while space holds it inward. In the case of sound maps, formed precisely as a result of this antinomic tension, in order to maintain epistemic parity and expand the field of possible cognitive operations, it makes sense to maintain a functional balance between the fullest possible disclosure of the content of the labels and the possibility of “hearing” these labels at a distance. Text in Russian

Laboratorium Russian Review of Social ResearchVol. 17(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Diverse Musicological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sound Maps and Their Antinomies: From Listening Subject to Audible Objects · Laboratorium Russian Review of Social Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS