Analisis Kekaburan Norma Hukum dan Risiko Maladministrasi dalam Tata Kelola BPI Danantara

The establishment of the Danantara Investment Management Agency (BPI Danantara) as a state-owned enterprise superholding company through Law No. 1 of 2025 on State-Owned Enterprises and Government Regulation No. 10 of 2025 on the Organization and Governance of BPI Danantara has significant implications for the architecture of state asset management. Although aimed at improving efficiency and optimizing state assets, the institutional regulatory design of Danantara contains a number of legal ambiguities that could potentially lead to maladministration. This study aims to critically examine the inconsistencies and normative ambiguities in the legal instruments governing BPI Danantara and their implications for the principles of state administrative law, particularly the principles of legality and legal certainty. A legal-normative approach is employed through an analysis of regulations based on the principles of good governance. The main findings reveal that the BPI Danantara regulations, particularly Article 9G, which does not classify Danantara administrators as state administrators, as well as the use of optional norms such as the phrase “may” in the formation of the Monitoring and Accountability Committee in Article 24, have created legal uncertainty. This situation not only has the potential to cause of maladministration but also threatens accountability and transparency. Such institutional design creates a gray area that leads to abuse of authority. In this context, the case of 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) is a relevant example of how a loose institutional structure can lead to systemic corruption scandals, with significant impacts on fiscal credibility and the country's reputation. Ultimately, this can reduce public trust and the country's fiscal credibility in the eyes of global investors. Therefore, regulatory reform is a strategic urgency to clarify legal ambiguity and strengthen the effectiveness of external oversight institutions to ensure integrity, transparency, and accountability at BPI Danantara.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55606/inovasi.v4i2.4304
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analisis Kekaburan Norma Hukum dan Risiko Maladministrasi dalam Tata Kelola BPI Danantara

Vina Hardyana Infantri, Retno Meilani
Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Analisis Kekaburan Norma Hukum dan Risiko Maladministrasi dalam Tata Kelola BPI Danantara

Vina Hardyana Infantri, Retno Meilani
article en

Abstract

The establishment of the Danantara Investment Management Agency (BPI Danantara) as a state-owned enterprise superholding company through Law No. 1 of 2025 on State-Owned Enterprises and Government Regulation No. 10 of 2025 on the Organization and Governance of BPI Danantara has significant implications for the architecture of state asset management. Although aimed at improving efficiency and optimizing state assets, the institutional regulatory design of Danantara contains a number of legal ambiguities that could potentially lead to maladministration. This study aims to critically examine the inconsistencies and normative ambiguities in the legal instruments governing BPI Danantara and their implications for the principles of state administrative law, particularly the principles of legality and legal certainty. A legal-normative approach is employed through an analysis of regulations based on the principles of good governance. The main findings reveal that the BPI Danantara regulations, particularly Article 9G, which does not classify Danantara administrators as state administrators, as well as the use of optional norms such as the phrase “may” in the formation of the Monitoring and Accountability Committee in Article 24, have created legal uncertainty. This situation not only has the potential to cause of maladministration but also threatens accountability and transparency. Such institutional design creates a gray area that leads to abuse of authority. In this context, the case of 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) is a relevant example of how a loose institutional structure can lead to systemic corruption scandals, with significant impacts on fiscal credibility and the country's reputation. Ultimately, this can reduce public trust and the country's fiscal credibility in the eyes of global investors. Therefore, regulatory reform is a strategic urgency to clarify legal ambiguity and strengthen the effectiveness of external oversight institutions to ensure integrity, transparency, and accountability at BPI Danantara.

Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan PendidikanVol. 4(2)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analisis Kekaburan Norma Hukum dan Risiko Maladministrasi dalam Tata Kelola BPI Danantara — Vina Hardyana Infantri, Retno Meilani · Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS