TIMED UP AND GO: SECONDS OR ACCELERATION TO MEASURE MOBILITY IN HEALTHY OLDER PEOPLE?

Abstract: This study investigates the convergent validity between acceleration features and the time needed to complete three variations of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The sample consisted of 73 active and healthy older people who were non-fallers and community-dwelling (São Carlos-SP, Brazil). Participants used a triaxial accelerometer at the waist while performing three variations of the TUG. Entropy, amplitude, and frequency features of the signal were extracted from all accelerometry data. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to investigate convergent validity. The average age of the sample was 70.16 years (SD=6.79), with a maximum age of 88 years and a minimum of 60 years. Women represented 56.6% (n=41) of participants. There were weak correlations between the acceleration data and the time needed to complete the simple TUG and its variations. Moderate to strong correlations were observed between variables extracted from the accelerometer signal, and strong correlations were found between the TUG variations seconds. This result demonstrates that although both can be used to measure mobility, they do not measure the same constructs. Combining TUG with an accelerometer and choosing only one variation of the TUG may provide a good combination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Estudos Interdisciplinares sobre o Envelhecimento
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22456/2316-2171.142733
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TIMED UP AND GO: SECONDS OR ACCELERATION TO MEASURE MOBILITY IN HEALTHY OLDER PEOPLE?

Patrícia Bet, Moacir Antonelli Ponti, Giovana Fondato Costa, Paula Costa Castro
Estudos Interdisciplinares sobre o Envelhecimento
Health disparities and outcomes
article

TIMED UP AND GO: SECONDS OR ACCELERATION TO MEASURE MOBILITY IN HEALTHY OLDER PEOPLE?

Patrícia Bet, Moacir Antonelli Ponti, Giovana Fondato Costa, Paula Costa Castro
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This study investigates the convergent validity between acceleration features and the time needed to complete three variations of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The sample consisted of 73 active and healthy older people who were non-fallers and community-dwelling (São Carlos-SP, Brazil). Participants used a triaxial accelerometer at the waist while performing three variations of the TUG. Entropy, amplitude, and frequency features of the signal were extracted from all accelerometry data. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to investigate convergent validity. The average age of the sample was 70.16 years (SD=6.79), with a maximum age of 88 years and a minimum of 60 years. Women represented 56.6% (n=41) of participants. There were weak correlations between the acceleration data and the time needed to complete the simple TUG and its variations. Moderate to strong correlations were observed between variables extracted from the accelerometer signal, and strong correlations were found between the TUG variations seconds. This result demonstrates that although both can be used to measure mobility, they do not measure the same constructs. Combining TUG with an accelerometer and choosing only one variation of the TUG may provide a good combination.

Estudos Interdisciplinares sobre o EnvelhecimentoVol. 29
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR), Faculdades Guarulhos (BR), Brazilian Society of Computational and Applied Mathematics (BR), Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.