Traps in the Energy Transition: Carbon Capture and Top-Down “Distributed” Energy

Abstract The energy transition presents policymakers and communities with emerging opportunities, divergent pathways and consequential choices. It is possible, on the one hand, to address climate change by moving to zero-carbon power generation while simultaneously ensuring equitable and affordable access to abundant clean energy. The transition is also an opportunity for the fossil fuel industry and other power sector actors to create new channels for profitmaking that can distract from addressing the causes of climate change, increase inequity in energy access and pose threats to safety and economic well-being, particularly for low-wealth households and environmental justice communities. This article addresses two prominent energy transition plans being pursued in the United States—carbon capture and top-down “distributed” energy. These strategies can, in varying ways, prove counter-productive to climate goals and human needs. An alternative framework is then presented: local solar generation and storage networks, structured for equitable and affordable access, reliability, local control and decarbonization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate Resilience and Justice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/crcj_a_00017
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traps in the Energy Transition: Carbon Capture and Top-Down “Distributed” Energy

June A. Sekera
Journal of Climate Resilience and Justice
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
article

Traps in the Energy Transition: Carbon Capture and Top-Down “Distributed” Energy

June A. Sekera
article en

Abstract

Abstract The energy transition presents policymakers and communities with emerging opportunities, divergent pathways and consequential choices. It is possible, on the one hand, to address climate change by moving to zero-carbon power generation while simultaneously ensuring equitable and affordable access to abundant clean energy. The transition is also an opportunity for the fossil fuel industry and other power sector actors to create new channels for profitmaking that can distract from addressing the causes of climate change, increase inequity in energy access and pose threats to safety and economic well-being, particularly for low-wealth households and environmental justice communities. This article addresses two prominent energy transition plans being pursued in the United States—carbon capture and top-down “distributed” energy. These strategies can, in varying ways, prove counter-productive to climate goals and human needs. An alternative framework is then presented: local solar generation and storage networks, structured for equitable and affordable access, reliability, local control and decarbonization.

Journal of Climate Resilience and JusticeVol. 2
Center for Autism and Related Disorders (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Traps in the Energy Transition: Carbon Capture and Top-Down “Distributed” Energy — June A. Sekera · Journal of Climate Resilience and Justice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS