Perception, Enablers and Barriers to the Practice of Physiologic Birth among Midwives in Birthing Facilities in Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Despite global advocacy for physiologic birth as a safe and empowering alternative to routine medicalized childbirth, its implementation remains limited across many regions, including Nigeria. In Bayelsa State, where maternal health indicators remain suboptimal, the rising tension between ideal midwifery practices and institutional realities warrants critical attention. The problem lies in the inconsistent application of physiologic birth, largely due to midwives’ perceptions, inadequate institutional support, and hierarchical decision-making structures. This study explored the perceptions, enablers, and barriers to the practice of physiologic birth among midwives in public birthing facilities across Bayelsa State, Nigeria. A qualitative cross-sectional design was employed, utilizing a 32-item unstructured interview guide to conduct focus group discussions with 27 licensed midwives across tertiary, secondary, and primary health facilities. The data were analyzed using Hsieh and Shannon’s five-step content analysis method. Findings revealed that while midwives held strong positive perceptions of physiologic birth as spontaneous, empowering, and woman-centered, their ability to implement it was hindered by restrictive hospital policies, inadequate antenatal education, medicalized training, and physician-dominated leadership. Conversely, midwives’ confidence, women’s birth preferences, and supportive birthing teams were identified as key enablers. The study concludes that the gap between belief and practice is shaped by both systemic and psychosocial factors. Applying the Health Belief Model clarified how midwives’ behavior is shaped by perceived benefits, barriers, self-efficacy, and institutional cues. Hence, it is essential for the Ministry of Health to institutionalize midwife-led care models by enacting policies that promote autonomy, equip facilities, and reframe midwifery as central to safe, respectful maternal healthcare

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IPS Journal of Basic and Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54117/ijbcm.v2i2.14
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception, Enablers and Barriers to the Practice of Physiologic Birth among Midwives in Birthing Facilities in Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Faith Diorgu, Kinikanwo Green, Chinemere Onyema, Ishember Tabitha Kutim
IPS Journal of Basic and Clinical Medicine
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Perception, Enablers and Barriers to the Practice of Physiologic Birth among Midwives in Birthing Facilities in Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Faith Diorgu, Kinikanwo Green, Chinemere Onyema, Ishember Tabitha Kutim
article en

Abstract

Despite global advocacy for physiologic birth as a safe and empowering alternative to routine medicalized childbirth, its implementation remains limited across many regions, including Nigeria. In Bayelsa State, where maternal health indicators remain suboptimal, the rising tension between ideal midwifery practices and institutional realities warrants critical attention. The problem lies in the inconsistent application of physiologic birth, largely due to midwives’ perceptions, inadequate institutional support, and hierarchical decision-making structures. This study explored the perceptions, enablers, and barriers to the practice of physiologic birth among midwives in public birthing facilities across Bayelsa State, Nigeria. A qualitative cross-sectional design was employed, utilizing a 32-item unstructured interview guide to conduct focus group discussions with 27 licensed midwives across tertiary, secondary, and primary health facilities. The data were analyzed using Hsieh and Shannon’s five-step content analysis method. Findings revealed that while midwives held strong positive perceptions of physiologic birth as spontaneous, empowering, and woman-centered, their ability to implement it was hindered by restrictive hospital policies, inadequate antenatal education, medicalized training, and physician-dominated leadership. Conversely, midwives’ confidence, women’s birth preferences, and supportive birthing teams were identified as key enablers. The study concludes that the gap between belief and practice is shaped by both systemic and psychosocial factors. Applying the Health Belief Model clarified how midwives’ behavior is shaped by perceived benefits, barriers, self-efficacy, and institutional cues. Hence, it is essential for the Ministry of Health to institutionalize midwife-led care models by enacting policies that promote autonomy, equip facilities, and reframe midwifery as central to safe, respectful maternal healthcare

IPS Journal of Basic and Clinical MedicineVol. 2(1)
University of Port Harcourt (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.