Addressing AI-Driven Cyber-Terrorism Within the Framework of International Law

AI has introduced new dimensions to cyberterrorism, enabling more sophisticated, automated, and potentially devastating attacks on critical infrastructure, democratic institutions, and global security. AI-driven tools, such as autonomous malware, intelligent surveillance systems, and deepfake technologies, have allowed terrorists to carry out complex operations with minimal human involvement and reduced detection risk. Despite these growing threats, existing international legal frameworks, such as the UN Charter [1], the Budapest Convention [2] on Cybercrime, and Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001), fail adequately to address the specific risks posed by AI-enabled cyberterrorism. The purpose of this paper is to explore the legal gaps and practical challenges associated with applying current international law to this evolving threat. A binding international treaty should be developed to define and criminalise AI-driven cyberterrorism, mandate state cooperation, and establish clear standards for prevention, attribution, and coordinated response. As a result of aligning international legal norms with emerging technological realities, the global community will be able to respond more effectively to AI-enhanced cyberthreats and build a safer, more secure digital future.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Journal of Politics and Law Research
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37745/gjplr.2013/vol13n34866
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing AI-Driven Cyber-Terrorism Within the Framework of International Law

Mohammad Reza Manoochehri
Global Journal of Politics and Law Research
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Addressing AI-Driven Cyber-Terrorism Within the Framework of International Law

Mohammad Reza Manoochehri
article en

Abstract

AI has introduced new dimensions to cyberterrorism, enabling more sophisticated, automated, and potentially devastating attacks on critical infrastructure, democratic institutions, and global security. AI-driven tools, such as autonomous malware, intelligent surveillance systems, and deepfake technologies, have allowed terrorists to carry out complex operations with minimal human involvement and reduced detection risk. Despite these growing threats, existing international legal frameworks, such as the UN Charter [1], the Budapest Convention [2] on Cybercrime, and Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001), fail adequately to address the specific risks posed by AI-enabled cyberterrorism. The purpose of this paper is to explore the legal gaps and practical challenges associated with applying current international law to this evolving threat. A binding international treaty should be developed to define and criminalise AI-driven cyberterrorism, mandate state cooperation, and establish clear standards for prevention, attribution, and coordinated response. As a result of aligning international legal norms with emerging technological realities, the global community will be able to respond more effectively to AI-enhanced cyberthreats and build a safer, more secure digital future.

Global Journal of Politics and Law ResearchVol. 13(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Addressing AI-Driven Cyber-Terrorism Within the Framework of International Law — Mohammad Reza Manoochehri · Global Journal of Politics and Law Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS