Comparative Study on Response Efficacy of Generative Artificial Intelligence Large Language Model for Elderly Diabetes Mellitus

We aimed to evaluate the response accuracy of different generative artificial intelligence (GAI) large language models to common problems of elderly diabetes, so as to compare the performance differences of various AI large language models in the quality of medical information service. A standardized evaluation question pool containing 10 elderly diabetes related questions was constructed, and then four GAI chat robots using different generative artificial intelligence large language model were selected to answer the questions and score the accuracy of all answers. In addition, the problem is summarized into two dimensions of “diagnosis and evaluation” and “control and treatment”, and the above four GAI big language models are analyzed in these two dimensions. In general, Moonshot model and Lark model are significantly better than DeepSeek LLM and SparkDesk model in response to common problems of elderly diabetes, with higher accuracy and strong stability, but there is no significant difference in response performance between Moonshot model and Lark model. In addition, in the dimensions of “diagnosis and evaluation” and “control and treatment”, Moonshot model and Lark model have better performance than DeepSeek LLM model and SparkDesk model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovations in Medical Research
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63593/jimr.2788-7022.2025.04.008
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study on Response Efficacy of Generative Artificial Intelligence Large Language Model for Elderly Diabetes Mellitus

Anny H. Xiang, Haixia Liu, Dehua Hu, Jinyu Tian
Journal of Innovations in Medical Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Comparative Study on Response Efficacy of Generative Artificial Intelligence Large Language Model for Elderly Diabetes Mellitus

Anny H. Xiang, Haixia Liu, Dehua Hu, Jinyu Tian
article en

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the response accuracy of different generative artificial intelligence (GAI) large language models to common problems of elderly diabetes, so as to compare the performance differences of various AI large language models in the quality of medical information service. A standardized evaluation question pool containing 10 elderly diabetes related questions was constructed, and then four GAI chat robots using different generative artificial intelligence large language model were selected to answer the questions and score the accuracy of all answers. In addition, the problem is summarized into two dimensions of “diagnosis and evaluation” and “control and treatment”, and the above four GAI big language models are analyzed in these two dimensions. In general, Moonshot model and Lark model are significantly better than DeepSeek LLM and SparkDesk model in response to common problems of elderly diabetes, with higher accuracy and strong stability, but there is no significant difference in response performance between Moonshot model and Lark model. In addition, in the dimensions of “diagnosis and evaluation” and “control and treatment”, Moonshot model and Lark model have better performance than DeepSeek LLM model and SparkDesk model.

Journal of Innovations in Medical ResearchVol. 4(2)
Central South University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.