Evaluation of Cascading and Alignment of Management Key Performance Indicators

This study evaluates the cascading and alignment process of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) at PT XYZ. The issue identified in this research is the misalignment between KPI scores at the business unit level and those at the Director and Corporate levels. The study utilizes primary data obtained from interviews and secondary data from supporting documents. A triangulation method involving document analysis, interviews, and strategy maps is employed to evaluate KPIs at the Corporate, Director, and business unit levels. The findings reveal that most KPIs have been effectively cascaded, reflecting causal relationships between strategic objectives. However, misalignment was identified in Business Unit 3 due to a lack of understanding of the cascading process. This study contributes by recommending strengthened inter-unit coordination, technology-based monitoring, and enhanced understanding of KPI cascading and alignment to support the achievement of the company’s vision. Keywords: Alignment; Balance Scorecard; Cascading; Key Performance Indicators; Strategy Maps

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
E-Jurnal Akuntansi
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2025.v35.i04.p13
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Cascading and Alignment of Management Key Performance Indicators

Yerika Putri, Ancella Anitawati Hermawan
E-Jurnal Akuntansi
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

Evaluation of Cascading and Alignment of Management Key Performance Indicators

Yerika Putri, Ancella Anitawati Hermawan
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the cascading and alignment process of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) at PT XYZ. The issue identified in this research is the misalignment between KPI scores at the business unit level and those at the Director and Corporate levels. The study utilizes primary data obtained from interviews and secondary data from supporting documents. A triangulation method involving document analysis, interviews, and strategy maps is employed to evaluate KPIs at the Corporate, Director, and business unit levels. The findings reveal that most KPIs have been effectively cascaded, reflecting causal relationships between strategic objectives. However, misalignment was identified in Business Unit 3 due to a lack of understanding of the cascading process. This study contributes by recommending strengthened inter-unit coordination, technology-based monitoring, and enhanced understanding of KPI cascading and alignment to support the achievement of the company’s vision. Keywords: Alignment; Balance Scorecard; Cascading; Key Performance Indicators; Strategy Maps

E-Jurnal AkuntansiVol. 35(4)
University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Cascading and Alignment of Management Key Performance Indicators — Yerika Putri, Ancella Anitawati Hermawan · E-Jurnal Akuntansi (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS