CAMEL Ratings and Bank Financial Distress Risk: Evidence from 2019–2023

This study investigates how CAMEL indicators influence financial distress among banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2019 to 2023. Employing a quantitative design, we estimate a structural equation model with AMOS 24 and supplement it with linear regression to trace the directional effects of each variable. A purposive sample of 40 banks forms the basis of the analysis. The findings reveal that the Capital Adequacy Ratio exerts a positive association with financial distress, whereas both Non-Performing Loans and the Net Profit Margin exhibit negative associations. Operating Expenses to Operating Income and the Loan-to-Deposit Ratio each display positive associations with distress risk. Taken together, the evidence suggests that CAMEL indicators alone do not exhaustively capture the onset of financial distress; additional, possibly more salient factors are likely at work. Keywords: CAMEL Analysis; Financial Distress; Bank.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
E-Jurnal Akuntansi
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2025.v35.i05.p14
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CAMEL Ratings and Bank Financial Distress Risk: Evidence from 2019–2023

Muhamad Fajrin Hayati, Muliyani Mahmud, Harun Blongkod
E-Jurnal Akuntansi
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

CAMEL Ratings and Bank Financial Distress Risk: Evidence from 2019–2023

Muhamad Fajrin Hayati, Muliyani Mahmud, Harun Blongkod
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how CAMEL indicators influence financial distress among banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2019 to 2023. Employing a quantitative design, we estimate a structural equation model with AMOS 24 and supplement it with linear regression to trace the directional effects of each variable. A purposive sample of 40 banks forms the basis of the analysis. The findings reveal that the Capital Adequacy Ratio exerts a positive association with financial distress, whereas both Non-Performing Loans and the Net Profit Margin exhibit negative associations. Operating Expenses to Operating Income and the Loan-to-Deposit Ratio each display positive associations with distress risk. Taken together, the evidence suggests that CAMEL indicators alone do not exhaustively capture the onset of financial distress; additional, possibly more salient factors are likely at work. Keywords: CAMEL Analysis; Financial Distress; Bank.

E-Jurnal AkuntansiVol. 35(5)
State University of Gorontalo (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CAMEL Ratings and Bank Financial Distress Risk: Evidence from 2019–2023 — Muhamad Fajrin Hayati, Muliyani Mahmud, et al. · E-Jurnal Akuntansi (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS