Pengendalian Konflik Agensi dalam Tahapan Investasi pada Startup dengan Pendanaan Modal Ventura

This research aims to manage agency conflicts such as information asymmetry and moral hazard that occur during the pre-investment to post-investment phases. During the investment process, Venture Capital acts as the principal, while Startups act as the agents. This study employs a qualitative method with a case study approach. The research subjects consist of one (1) Startup in the financial technology (fintech) sector and two (2) Venture Capital firms, one owned by a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) and the other privately owned. The findings indicate that managing agency conflicts between Venture Capital and Startups requires comprehensive pre-investment assessments, including initial selection that covers financial and non-financial aspects, as well as contractual agreements involving a due diligence process. Meanwhile, post-investment management is carried out through performance monitoring, staged funding, and forming a Venture Capital Syndicate. Keywords: Agency Conflict; Moral Hazard; Information Asymmetry; Venture Capital; Startup.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
E-Jurnal Akuntansi
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2025.v35.i02.p19
Primary Topic
Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pengendalian Konflik Agensi dalam Tahapan Investasi pada Startup dengan Pendanaan Modal Ventura

Ratih Mustikoningsih, Budi Frensidy
E-Jurnal Akuntansi
Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
article

Pengendalian Konflik Agensi dalam Tahapan Investasi pada Startup dengan Pendanaan Modal Ventura

Ratih Mustikoningsih, Budi Frensidy
article en

Abstract

This research aims to manage agency conflicts such as information asymmetry and moral hazard that occur during the pre-investment to post-investment phases. During the investment process, Venture Capital acts as the principal, while Startups act as the agents. This study employs a qualitative method with a case study approach. The research subjects consist of one (1) Startup in the financial technology (fintech) sector and two (2) Venture Capital firms, one owned by a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) and the other privately owned. The findings indicate that managing agency conflicts between Venture Capital and Startups requires comprehensive pre-investment assessments, including initial selection that covers financial and non-financial aspects, as well as contractual agreements involving a due diligence process. Meanwhile, post-investment management is carried out through performance monitoring, staged funding, and forming a Venture Capital Syndicate. Keywords: Agency Conflict; Moral Hazard; Information Asymmetry; Venture Capital; Startup.

E-Jurnal AkuntansiVol. 35(2)
University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.