Flexibility as Theory of Change in the Brazilian Sugarcane Industry

ABSTRACT: Sugarcane in Brazil has been used for centuries to make refined sugar and, more recently, ethanol-based biofuels. The flexibility to switch between sugar and biofuel production at the mill, depending on market prices, is often explicitly presented as key to the viability of the sector amid chronic production crises. In Brazil, sugarcane is not only for sugar anymore. While many take this flexibility as a self-evident, inherent property, this article instead argues that Brazilian sugarcane flexibility is only achieved through technical and infrastructural practices. In the practice and achievement of flexibility, something more is made too: flexibility becomes a story-telling device that generates meaning beyond the notion of flexibility itself. This further meaning is around ideas of change. Specifically, flexibility constitutes an articulation of a theory of change that involves a certain warrant for change—industry crisis—and a certain mechanism of change: making the industry plastic and agile rather than asking why it is in crisis in the first place. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and interviews with sugarcane actors in São Paulo, this article examines flexibility's social lives not reducible to neoliberalism and post-Fordism, and demonstrates the analytical necessity to not take properties of products or production systems for granted. At stake most broadly is that flexibility's theory of change maintains the status quo, locating change in the properties of materials rather than the operation of broader systems that utilize those materials, like extractive capitalism, even when those broader systems are the cause of the problems that flexibility is intended to respond to.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anthropological Quarterly
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2025.a964971
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexibility as Theory of Change in the Brazilian Sugarcane Industry

Karl T. Ulrich
1 citations
Anthropological Quarterly
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
article

Flexibility as Theory of Change in the Brazilian Sugarcane Industry

Karl T. Ulrich
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Sugarcane in Brazil has been used for centuries to make refined sugar and, more recently, ethanol-based biofuels. The flexibility to switch between sugar and biofuel production at the mill, depending on market prices, is often explicitly presented as key to the viability of the sector amid chronic production crises. In Brazil, sugarcane is not only for sugar anymore. While many take this flexibility as a self-evident, inherent property, this article instead argues that Brazilian sugarcane flexibility is only achieved through technical and infrastructural practices. In the practice and achievement of flexibility, something more is made too: flexibility becomes a story-telling device that generates meaning beyond the notion of flexibility itself. This further meaning is around ideas of change. Specifically, flexibility constitutes an articulation of a theory of change that involves a certain warrant for change—industry crisis—and a certain mechanism of change: making the industry plastic and agile rather than asking why it is in crisis in the first place. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and interviews with sugarcane actors in São Paulo, this article examines flexibility's social lives not reducible to neoliberalism and post-Fordism, and demonstrates the analytical necessity to not take properties of products or production systems for granted. At stake most broadly is that flexibility's theory of change maintains the status quo, locating change in the properties of materials rather than the operation of broader systems that utilize those materials, like extractive capitalism, even when those broader systems are the cause of the problems that flexibility is intended to respond to.

Anthropological QuarterlyVol. 98(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.