CASTRATION PUNISHMENT FOR PERPETRATORS OF SEXUAL PERVERSION AGAINST CHILDREN IN ISLAMIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS STUDIES

The focus of this research is to identify the review of Islamic and Human Rights law on castration punishment for perpetrators of sexual deviations against children. This normative legal research uses a normative juridical approach. The results show that, first, in the view of Islamic law, the application of castration punishment against child rapists is declared haram because it is contrary to the principle of respect for the integrity of the human body. Meanwhile, then, in the perspective of human rights, the application of chemical castration punishment raises debates because there are views that clash with the principle of human rights protection, because it can eliminate biological abilities in intercourse. This research emphasizes the importance of reviewing in the perspective of integration of Islamic law and Human Rights on the aspects of effectiveness and humanity related to the application of castration punishment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AL-AQWAL Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53491/alaqwal.v4i01.1728
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CASTRATION PUNISHMENT FOR PERPETRATORS OF SEXUAL PERVERSION AGAINST CHILDREN IN ISLAMIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS STUDIES

Alfiandri Setiawan, Zul Ikromi, Saura Chaerunnisa
AL-AQWAL Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam
International Law and Human Rights
article

CASTRATION PUNISHMENT FOR PERPETRATORS OF SEXUAL PERVERSION AGAINST CHILDREN IN ISLAMIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS STUDIES

Alfiandri Setiawan, Zul Ikromi, Saura Chaerunnisa
article en

Abstract

The focus of this research is to identify the review of Islamic and Human Rights law on castration punishment for perpetrators of sexual deviations against children. This normative legal research uses a normative juridical approach. The results show that, first, in the view of Islamic law, the application of castration punishment against child rapists is declared haram because it is contrary to the principle of respect for the integrity of the human body. Meanwhile, then, in the perspective of human rights, the application of chemical castration punishment raises debates because there are views that clash with the principle of human rights protection, because it can eliminate biological abilities in intercourse. This research emphasizes the importance of reviewing in the perspective of integration of Islamic law and Human Rights on the aspects of effectiveness and humanity related to the application of castration punishment.

AL-AQWAL Jurnal Kajian Hukum IslamVol. 4(01)
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.