Comparison of Active Damping Methods for Grid-Forming Voltage-Source Converters

Active damping is crucial for the stable operation and dynamic performance of grid-forming (GFM) voltage source converters (VSCs). This paper presents a comparative analysis of active damping methods used in the synchronization control of GFM-VSCs. These methods are classified into frequency-difference-based, active-power-based, and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$q$</tex>-axis-voltage-based damping approaches. The comparison is based on three key metrics: reference tracking performance, inertial response capability, and stability impact. The advantages and drawbacks of each approach are analyzed, and practical design guidelines are proposed, including hybrid configurations that integrate power and voltage feedforward strategies. The effectiveness of the comparative evaluation is validated through both simulation and experimental results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/pedg62294.2025.11060423
Primary Topic
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Active Damping Methods for Grid-Forming Voltage-Source Converters

Liang Zhao, Xiongfei Wang, Xiaonan Gao
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
article

Comparison of Active Damping Methods for Grid-Forming Voltage-Source Converters

Liang Zhao, Xiongfei Wang, Xiaonan Gao
article en

Abstract

Active damping is crucial for the stable operation and dynamic performance of grid-forming (GFM) voltage source converters (VSCs). This paper presents a comparative analysis of active damping methods used in the synchronization control of GFM-VSCs. These methods are classified into frequency-difference-based, active-power-based, and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$q$</tex>-axis-voltage-based damping approaches. The comparison is based on three key metrics: reference tracking performance, inertial response capability, and stability impact. The advantages and drawbacks of each approach are analyzed, and practical design guidelines are proposed, including hybrid configurations that integrate power and voltage feedforward strategies. The effectiveness of the comparative evaluation is validated through both simulation and experimental results.

KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.