Performance Analysis of Depth Intra Coding

Modern view synthesis methods (e.g., depth-image-based rendering or DIBR) rely on depth maps to generate additional virtual views from existing texture images. Since depth maps convey geometric scene information and are not directly observed by viewers, coding performance should be judged by the quality impact on synthesized views rather than the depth images themselves. Depth maps can be compressed using conventional intra-frame video codecs (such as H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, and AVS3) because they are essentially 2D images. This paper presents a comparative analysis of depth intra-coding efficiency using the reference encoders of H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, and AVS3. For fair evaluation, we measure each encoder’s performance based on the objective quality of a virtual view synthesized from the decoded depth data. Under consistent test conditions, experimental results show that the AVS3 and HEVC encoders achieve average bit-rate reductions of 48.06% and 43.40%, respectively, relative to H.264/AVC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cisce65916.2025.11065132
Primary Topic
Video Coding and Compression Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Analysis of Depth Intra Coding

Yangang Cai, Songlin Sun, Rongjie Wang, Zhen Song et al.
Video Coding and Compression Technologies
article

Performance Analysis of Depth Intra Coding

Yangang Cai, Songlin Sun, Rongjie Wang, Zhen Song, Yuqiang Zhang
article en

Abstract

Modern view synthesis methods (e.g., depth-image-based rendering or DIBR) rely on depth maps to generate additional virtual views from existing texture images. Since depth maps convey geometric scene information and are not directly observed by viewers, coding performance should be judged by the quality impact on synthesized views rather than the depth images themselves. Depth maps can be compressed using conventional intra-frame video codecs (such as H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, and AVS3) because they are essentially 2D images. This paper presents a comparative analysis of depth intra-coding efficiency using the reference encoders of H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, and AVS3. For fair evaluation, we measure each encoder’s performance based on the objective quality of a virtual view synthesized from the decoded depth data. Under consistent test conditions, experimental results show that the AVS3 and HEVC encoders achieve average bit-rate reductions of 48.06% and 43.40%, respectively, relative to H.264/AVC.

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Video Coding and Compression Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance Analysis of Depth Intra Coding — Yangang Cai, Songlin Sun, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS