Exploring How SE Academic Papers Use Figures

The usage of figures to represent data or concepts in scientific articles is a common practice. We aim to understand what figures are used for in SE articles and in particular how quantitative data is represented. For this purpose we analyzed 865 articles published in leading software engineering scientific conferences and journals and classified 6342 figures and their contents. 47% of the figures are used to convey quantitative information and the rest depict more abstract non-quantitative information. The most common types of quantitative diagrams are bar plots, box plots, and line plots, accounting for 75% of the quantitative figures. We also found that each figure contains 1.6 errors, although 75% of them do not contain any critical error. Critical blatant errors are found in less than 5% of the figures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/wsese66602.2025.00009
Primary Topic
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring How SE Academic Papers Use Figures

Marco Torchiano, Lorenzo Laudadio
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
article

Exploring How SE Academic Papers Use Figures

Marco Torchiano, Lorenzo Laudadio
article en

Abstract

The usage of figures to represent data or concepts in scientific articles is a common practice. We aim to understand what figures are used for in SE articles and in particular how quantitative data is represented. For this purpose we analyzed 865 articles published in leading software engineering scientific conferences and journals and classified 6342 figures and their contents. 47% of the figures are used to convey quantitative information and the rest depict more abstract non-quantitative information. The most common types of quantitative diagrams are bar plots, box plots, and line plots, accounting for 75% of the quantitative figures. We also found that each figure contains 1.6 errors, although 75% of them do not contain any critical error. Critical blatant errors are found in less than 5% of the figures.

Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.