Introduction

Abstract This introduction puts forward capture as an anthropological analytic. Idioms of capture already pervade anthropological descriptions, analyses, and methods. We start by questioning the widespread equivalence between capture and predation, showing that neither of these terms should be read as rifts in sociality but rather as continuations of the social by other means. The significance of the diverse socialities of capture is clarified in relation to previous works that demonstrate how capture folds over and into itself, entrapping not just the prey, but also the captors. By bringing this idea to bear on ethnographic analyses of capture, we argue that capture is frequently deployed as a generic term—a catch word—that simultaneously defines the work of the generic itself as a mode of capture or containment. Lastly, what sets capture apart from notions such as network or entanglement is its recursive potential as a verb and metonym for ethnographic inquiry and representation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Social Analysis
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2024.680401
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction

Ana Chirițoiu, Chakad Ojani
Social Analysis
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

Introduction

Ana Chirițoiu, Chakad Ojani
article en

Abstract

Abstract This introduction puts forward capture as an anthropological analytic. Idioms of capture already pervade anthropological descriptions, analyses, and methods. We start by questioning the widespread equivalence between capture and predation, showing that neither of these terms should be read as rifts in sociality but rather as continuations of the social by other means. The significance of the diverse socialities of capture is clarified in relation to previous works that demonstrate how capture folds over and into itself, entrapping not just the prey, but also the captors. By bringing this idea to bear on ethnographic analyses of capture, we argue that capture is frequently deployed as a generic term—a catch word—that simultaneously defines the work of the generic itself as a mode of capture or containment. Lastly, what sets capture apart from notions such as network or entanglement is its recursive potential as a verb and metonym for ethnographic inquiry and representation.

Social AnalysisVol. 68(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.