Western Academic Insight of Islam and its Prophet: A Critical Reading to the Writings of Watt, Norman, and Considine

Abstract There has been a gradual change in the Western academic stand toward developing scholarly approaches to investigate Prophet Muhammad’s Islamic mission to the world. Early Western Orientalists presented Prophet Muhammad as a mistaken person to the founder of Islam and antichrist, but this is continually refined by academic advancement. Although Europeans now have a more realistic view of Islam and its Prophet, some historical biases persist, such as the portrayal of Thomas Carlyle for Prophet Muhammad as a world leader or hero. However, his true nature as a divine messenger is entirely missed or denied. Watt, Norman, and Considine examined, sorted, and proved some distorted reports. These academic experts advanced their approaches to understanding Prophet Muhammad’s manners. They acknowledged the reflection of a European prejudice toward the Western material about Islam and its Messenger. More hard work is required to narrow the gap of misunderstanding between Islam and The West.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Al-Tamaddun
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22452/jat.vol20no1.7
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Western Academic Insight of Islam and its Prophet: A Critical Reading to the Writings of Watt, Norman, and Considine

Mohammad Takdir
Journal of Al-Tamaddun
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
article

Western Academic Insight of Islam and its Prophet: A Critical Reading to the Writings of Watt, Norman, and Considine

Mohammad Takdir
article en

Abstract

Abstract There has been a gradual change in the Western academic stand toward developing scholarly approaches to investigate Prophet Muhammad’s Islamic mission to the world. Early Western Orientalists presented Prophet Muhammad as a mistaken person to the founder of Islam and antichrist, but this is continually refined by academic advancement. Although Europeans now have a more realistic view of Islam and its Prophet, some historical biases persist, such as the portrayal of Thomas Carlyle for Prophet Muhammad as a world leader or hero. However, his true nature as a divine messenger is entirely missed or denied. Watt, Norman, and Considine examined, sorted, and proved some distorted reports. These academic experts advanced their approaches to understanding Prophet Muhammad’s manners. They acknowledged the reflection of a European prejudice toward the Western material about Islam and its Messenger. More hard work is required to narrow the gap of misunderstanding between Islam and The West.

Journal of Al-TamaddunVol. 20(1)
University of Jeddah (SA)
University of Jeddah
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.