Evaluasi Validitas dan Kualitas Soal Pilihan Ganda Mata Pelajaran IPAS Kelas VI SDN 159 Palembang

This study aims to evaluate the validity and quality of multiple-choice items in the Science and Social Studies (IPAS) subject for sixth-grade students at SDN 159 Palembang. The evaluation seeks to ensure that the test items used in assessments can accurately and fairly measure student competencies. A quantitative approach with descriptive methods was applied. The sample consisted of 30 multiple-choice questions from the odd semester examination in the 2024/2025 academic year. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. The findings show that, in terms of content validity, 24 items (80%) were categorized as valid, while 6 items (20%) were invalid. Regarding item difficulty, 10 items (33.33%) were classified as easy, 15 items (50%) as moderate, and 5 items (16.67%) as difficult. In terms of discrimination power, 6 items (20%) had excellent discrimination, 9 items (30%) were good, 8 items (26.67%) were fair, and 7 items (23.33%) had poor discrimination. For distractor effectiveness, 68 distractors (75.56%) were effective, while 22 (24.44%) were ineffective due to lack of selection by students. In conclusion, the overall quality of the IPAS multiple-choice questions used in SDN 159 Palembang is fairly good, particularly in terms of validity and difficulty. However, improvements are needed for items with low discrimination power and ineffective distractors to enhance the assessment's ability to measure learning outcomes accurately

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovative and Creativity (Joecy)
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.1229
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluasi Validitas dan Kualitas Soal Pilihan Ganda Mata Pelajaran IPAS Kelas VI SDN 159 Palembang

Lidya Febrianti, Reska Ayu Natasya, Priska Utami, Raihana Raihana et al.
Journal of Innovative and Creativity (Joecy)
Educational Research and Methods
article

Evaluasi Validitas dan Kualitas Soal Pilihan Ganda Mata Pelajaran IPAS Kelas VI SDN 159 Palembang

Lidya Febrianti, Reska Ayu Natasya, Priska Utami, Raihana Raihana, Afrianto Afrianto
article en

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the validity and quality of multiple-choice items in the Science and Social Studies (IPAS) subject for sixth-grade students at SDN 159 Palembang. The evaluation seeks to ensure that the test items used in assessments can accurately and fairly measure student competencies. A quantitative approach with descriptive methods was applied. The sample consisted of 30 multiple-choice questions from the odd semester examination in the 2024/2025 academic year. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. The findings show that, in terms of content validity, 24 items (80%) were categorized as valid, while 6 items (20%) were invalid. Regarding item difficulty, 10 items (33.33%) were classified as easy, 15 items (50%) as moderate, and 5 items (16.67%) as difficult. In terms of discrimination power, 6 items (20%) had excellent discrimination, 9 items (30%) were good, 8 items (26.67%) were fair, and 7 items (23.33%) had poor discrimination. For distractor effectiveness, 68 distractors (75.56%) were effective, while 22 (24.44%) were ineffective due to lack of selection by students. In conclusion, the overall quality of the IPAS multiple-choice questions used in SDN 159 Palembang is fairly good, particularly in terms of validity and difficulty. However, improvements are needed for items with low discrimination power and ineffective distractors to enhance the assessment's ability to measure learning outcomes accurately

Journal of Innovative and Creativity (Joecy)Vol. 5(2)
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung (ID), Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Educational Research and Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluasi Validitas dan Kualitas Soal Pilihan Ganda Mata Pelajaran IPAS Kelas VI SDN 159 Palembang — Lidya Febrianti, Reska Ayu Natasya, et al. · Journal of Innovative and Creativity (Joecy) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS