COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CARBON EMISSION AND PRICE ON THE ALTERNATIVES OF BUILDING WALL CONSTRUCTION

The Indonesian government wants to meet the demand for housing by increasing housing development. However, the increase in housing development also contributes to a large percentage of carbon emissions. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC), a commonly used wall material, and precast sandwich panels (PSP), which have low emissions. The research was conducted to determine how the two materials compare prices to meet housing needs and emission reduction goals. The study is carried out by its price to meet the demand target and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to meet the emission reduction target. The subject of the study is one of a complex of 40 types of house buildings. Their wall construction cost and transportation cost determine the price. LCA approached the method with a cradle-to-handover framework, which is used to identify the carbon embodiment of a building. The results show that PSP walls cost 53.30% more to build than AAC walls but produce 37.20% less carbon emissions. The highest emissions occur during the production/manufacturing phase. Future studies could adopt a cradle-to-grave LCA framework to provide a more comprehensive assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Built Environment Studies
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22146/best.v5i2.18778
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CARBON EMISSION AND PRICE ON THE ALTERNATIVES OF BUILDING WALL CONSTRUCTION

Azwan Iskandar Azmi, Wirawan Fawaza, Bratha Ariyuda
Built Environment Studies
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CARBON EMISSION AND PRICE ON THE ALTERNATIVES OF BUILDING WALL CONSTRUCTION

Azwan Iskandar Azmi, Wirawan Fawaza, Bratha Ariyuda
article en

Abstract

The Indonesian government wants to meet the demand for housing by increasing housing development. However, the increase in housing development also contributes to a large percentage of carbon emissions. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC), a commonly used wall material, and precast sandwich panels (PSP), which have low emissions. The research was conducted to determine how the two materials compare prices to meet housing needs and emission reduction goals. The study is carried out by its price to meet the demand target and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to meet the emission reduction target. The subject of the study is one of a complex of 40 types of house buildings. Their wall construction cost and transportation cost determine the price. LCA approached the method with a cradle-to-handover framework, which is used to identify the carbon embodiment of a building. The results show that PSP walls cost 53.30% more to build than AAC walls but produce 37.20% less carbon emissions. The highest emissions occur during the production/manufacturing phase. Future studies could adopt a cradle-to-grave LCA framework to provide a more comprehensive assessment.

Built Environment StudiesVol. 5(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.