Sea otter interactions with mariculture oyster farms

Abstract While oyster farms and sea otters ( Enhydra lutris ) coexist in some locations, sustaining these farms and growing interest in their expansion necessitate a comprehensive evaluation of potential interactions. We assessed sea otter interactions with oyster farms through behavioral observations of otters in oyster farms, adjacent non‐farm areas (controls), or bays with no farming activity (references) in southcentral Alaska in 2022–2023. Behavioral observations, conducted through scan surveys, captured sea otter activities (e.g., resting, grooming, swimming, and foraging). Targeted foraging observations tracked foraging success and prey (species and count). We hypothesized that sea otters preferentially used oyster farms for foraging and resting activities compared to non‐farm areas. Contrary to our hypothesis, sea otter activities showed no significant difference in foraging or resting behaviors between oyster farms and controls. Similarly, foraging behavior, including success and prey diversity, did not differ among areas. The dominant prey items in our study included clams (e.g., butter clam [ Saxidomus gigantea ]), crabs (e.g., helmet crab [ Telmessus cheiragonus ], red rock crab [ Cancer productus ]), and mussels (e.g., Pacific blue mussel [ Mytilus trossulus ]). Notably, there were no observations of farmed oysters being consumed by sea otters. There was strong evidence of differences in the average number of prey consumed per sea otter per dive between the control and reference areas, with the control area averaging 2.6 prey items per dive (SD = 3.6) compared to 4.8 prey items per dive (SD = 7.3) in the reference area. These differences may be attributed to variations in prey biomass and environmental conditions. Our observations indicate that there are no discernible differences in overall sea otter activity or foraging behavior in the presence of oyster farms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70055
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sea otter interactions with mariculture oyster farms

Lara Horstmann, Emily M. Reynolds, Brenda Konar
1 citations
Journal of Wildlife Management
Marine animal studies overview
1.72
article

Sea otter interactions with mariculture oyster farms

Lara Horstmann, Emily M. Reynolds, Brenda Konar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract While oyster farms and sea otters ( Enhydra lutris ) coexist in some locations, sustaining these farms and growing interest in their expansion necessitate a comprehensive evaluation of potential interactions. We assessed sea otter interactions with oyster farms through behavioral observations of otters in oyster farms, adjacent non‐farm areas (controls), or bays with no farming activity (references) in southcentral Alaska in 2022–2023. Behavioral observations, conducted through scan surveys, captured sea otter activities (e.g., resting, grooming, swimming, and foraging). Targeted foraging observations tracked foraging success and prey (species and count). We hypothesized that sea otters preferentially used oyster farms for foraging and resting activities compared to non‐farm areas. Contrary to our hypothesis, sea otter activities showed no significant difference in foraging or resting behaviors between oyster farms and controls. Similarly, foraging behavior, including success and prey diversity, did not differ among areas. The dominant prey items in our study included clams (e.g., butter clam [ Saxidomus gigantea ]), crabs (e.g., helmet crab [ Telmessus cheiragonus ], red rock crab [ Cancer productus ]), and mussels (e.g., Pacific blue mussel [ Mytilus trossulus ]). Notably, there were no observations of farmed oysters being consumed by sea otters. There was strong evidence of differences in the average number of prey consumed per sea otter per dive between the control and reference areas, with the control area averaging 2.6 prey items per dive (SD = 3.6) compared to 4.8 prey items per dive (SD = 7.3) in the reference area. These differences may be attributed to variations in prey biomass and environmental conditions. Our observations indicate that there are no discernible differences in overall sea otter activity or foraging behavior in the presence of oyster farms.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 89(6)
University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
Alaska Sea Grant, University of Alaska Fairbanks
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Marine animal studies overview
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sea otter interactions with mariculture oyster farms — Lara Horstmann, Emily M. Reynolds, et al. · Journal of Wildlife Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS