Predicting Medical Claim Denial Using Logistic Regression and Decision Tree Algorithm

This study utilizes decision tree and logistic regression models to explore the factors contributing to medical claim denials and identify areas for improvement. We adapt undersampling technique in data preprocessing to balance the dataset. To enhance model accuracy, we employ augmented backward elimination to remove insignificant variables, and grid search cross-validation in tree pruning. Our findings suggest that decision trees are superior in predicting claim denials, though they underperform in predicting claim approvals compared to logistic regression. The analysis also highlights factors such as the insurance category, hospital specialty, and the interval between service date and claim submission date significantly influence denial rates. These insights are crucial for healthcare denial management, enabling targeted interventions and enhanced training for clinic operation to focus on key denial factors. Finally, the findings suggest the potential of predictive models to improve denial processes and enhance the efficiency of healthcare billing systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ichih63459.2024.11064794
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Medical Claim Denial Using Logistic Regression and Decision Tree Algorithm

Suijing Guan
17 citations
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
5.91
article

Predicting Medical Claim Denial Using Logistic Regression and Decision Tree Algorithm

Suijing Guan
article en
17 citations

Abstract

This study utilizes decision tree and logistic regression models to explore the factors contributing to medical claim denials and identify areas for improvement. We adapt undersampling technique in data preprocessing to balance the dataset. To enhance model accuracy, we employ augmented backward elimination to remove insignificant variables, and grid search cross-validation in tree pruning. Our findings suggest that decision trees are superior in predicting claim denials, though they underperform in predicting claim approvals compared to logistic regression. The analysis also highlights factors such as the insurance category, hospital specialty, and the interval between service date and claim submission date significantly influence denial rates. These insights are crucial for healthcare denial management, enabling targeted interventions and enhanced training for clinic operation to focus on key denial factors. Finally, the findings suggest the potential of predictive models to improve denial processes and enhance the efficiency of healthcare billing systems.

University of South Alabama (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
5.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.