Risk of secondary bacterial infections during treatment with anti-inflammatory genetically engineered biological drugs in COVID-19 patients

The aim of the work was to identify the presence and strength of association between the use of anti-inflammatory genetically engineered biological drugs and the development of secondary bacterial infections in COVID-19 patients. Materials and methods. We used 1 296 medical records of patients hospitalized in the infectious diseases hospital of the Volgograd region with a diagnosis of COVID-19 in September 2020, March and September 2021, March, September and November 2022, have been analyzed. A matched case-control study was performed with 275 pairs identical in gender, age (±2 years), the severity of the lung damage according to computed tomography / chest X-ray, a COVID-19 outcome, concomitant carbohydrate metabolism disorders. Patients with the signs of the secondary bacterial infection (leukocytes ≥12×109/l, procalcitonin ≥0.5 ng/ml and/or viral-bacterial pneumonia according to the autopsy data) were presented as a case. The “control” group included patients without signs of any bacterial infection (leukocytes <11×109/l, procalcitonin <0.5 ng/ml, no description of clinical signs of the bacterial infection in the medical record during the hospitalization). The prescription of 6 anti-inflammatory genetically engineered biological drugs (tocilizumab, sarilumab, olokizumab, levilimab, netakimab, secukinumab) has been studied for these groups. Results. The use of any anti-inflammatory genetically engineered biological drug was associated with the development of the secondary bacterial infection signs (OR=2.41; 95% CI: from 1.54 to 3.77; p < 0.001): for levilimab, the OR was 3.44 (95% CI: from 1.64 to 7.23; p < 0.001), for tocilizumab – OR=1.75 (95% CI: from 0.73 to 4.17; p =0.201), for olokizumab – OR=1.28 (95% CI: from 0.81 to 2.03; p =0.292). Conclusion. Among the three drugs (tocilizumab, olokizumab, levilimab), the Russian biosimilar olokizumab, a monoclonal antibody to circulating interleukin-6, has shown itself as the safest drug in terms of preventing the secondary bacterial infection signs. Further studies of developing bacterial complications risk in COVID-19 patients receiving anti-inflammatory genetically engineered biological drugs are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmacy & Pharmacology
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19163/2307-9266-2024-12-3-209-218
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk of secondary bacterial infections during treatment with anti-inflammatory genetically engineered biological drugs in COVID-19 patients

A. Yu. Ryazanova, В. И. Петров, N. S. Tokareva
Pharmacy & Pharmacology
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

Risk of secondary bacterial infections during treatment with anti-inflammatory genetically engineered biological drugs in COVID-19 patients

A. Yu. Ryazanova, В. И. Петров, N. S. Tokareva
article en

Abstract

The aim of the work was to identify the presence and strength of association between the use of anti-inflammatory genetically engineered biological drugs and the development of secondary bacterial infections in COVID-19 patients. Materials and methods. We used 1 296 medical records of patients hospitalized in the infectious diseases hospital of the Volgograd region with a diagnosis of COVID-19 in September 2020, March and September 2021, March, September and November 2022, have been analyzed. A matched case-control study was performed with 275 pairs identical in gender, age (±2 years), the severity of the lung damage according to computed tomography / chest X-ray, a COVID-19 outcome, concomitant carbohydrate metabolism disorders. Patients with the signs of the secondary bacterial infection (leukocytes ≥12×109/l, procalcitonin ≥0.5 ng/ml and/or viral-bacterial pneumonia according to the autopsy data) were presented as a case. The “control” group included patients without signs of any bacterial infection (leukocytes <11×109/l, procalcitonin <0.5 ng/ml, no description of clinical signs of the bacterial infection in the medical record during the hospitalization). The prescription of 6 anti-inflammatory genetically engineered biological drugs (tocilizumab, sarilumab, olokizumab, levilimab, netakimab, secukinumab) has been studied for these groups. Results. The use of any anti-inflammatory genetically engineered biological drug was associated with the development of the secondary bacterial infection signs (OR=2.41; 95% CI: from 1.54 to 3.77; p < 0.001): for levilimab, the OR was 3.44 (95% CI: from 1.64 to 7.23; p < 0.001), for tocilizumab – OR=1.75 (95% CI: from 0.73 to 4.17; p =0.201), for olokizumab – OR=1.28 (95% CI: from 0.81 to 2.03; p =0.292). Conclusion. Among the three drugs (tocilizumab, olokizumab, levilimab), the Russian biosimilar olokizumab, a monoclonal antibody to circulating interleukin-6, has shown itself as the safest drug in terms of preventing the secondary bacterial infection signs. Further studies of developing bacterial complications risk in COVID-19 patients receiving anti-inflammatory genetically engineered biological drugs are required.

Pharmacy & PharmacologyVol. 12(3)
Volgograd State Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.