Martin Lipscomb: ‘Questioning the Use Value of Qualitative Research Findings’ (2012)

This article discusses a paper by Martin Lipscomb, published in 2012. Martin's paper asks whether the findings in qualitative nursing research can provide evidence robust enough to inform nursing practice. Martin appraises various arguments designed to establish that qualitative studies do provide a basis for action, and concludes that they fail. I provide a commentary on the paper, and then look at more recent attempts to vindicate the use value of qualitative research. I argue that the question 'What requirements must qualitative studies meet if they are to serve as a basis for future action?' has only one persuasive answer. Unfortunately, the relevant requirements are not met by the majority of qualitative studies in nursing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Philosophy
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70032
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Martin Lipscomb: ‘Questioning the Use Value of Qualitative Research Findings’ (2012)

John Paley
Nursing Philosophy
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Martin Lipscomb: ‘Questioning the Use Value of Qualitative Research Findings’ (2012)

John Paley
article en

Abstract

This article discusses a paper by Martin Lipscomb, published in 2012. Martin's paper asks whether the findings in qualitative nursing research can provide evidence robust enough to inform nursing practice. Martin appraises various arguments designed to establish that qualitative studies do provide a basis for action, and concludes that they fail. I provide a commentary on the paper, and then look at more recent attempts to vindicate the use value of qualitative research. I argue that the question 'What requirements must qualitative studies meet if they are to serve as a basis for future action?' has only one persuasive answer. Unfortunately, the relevant requirements are not met by the majority of qualitative studies in nursing.

Nursing PhilosophyVol. 26(3)
University of Worcester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.