Engineering Students' Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence

ABSTRACT This study explores the evolving landscape of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in engineering education. With technologies like ChatGPT transforming academic practices, universities are experiencing related challenges with integration, ethics and academic integrity. This study was conducted at a South African university to gain insights into how engineering students use GAI applications and their perceptions of these applications in their academic study. Using a survey based on previous studies, data were collected from undergraduate and postgraduate engineering students. The results reveal widespread adoption of GAI applications, with preferences regarding appropriate use and regulation approaches. Students generally support GAI as a learning aid while also expressing concerns about its use in formal assessments. They prefer discipline‐specific guidance over institutional policies, with only 1% supporting a complete ban on GAI use. The findings indicate significant interest in structured education about ethical GAI use, with many students planning to continue using these technologies in their future careers. This study provides insights for engineering educators working to balance innovation with academic integrity, highlighting the need for collaborative approaches between students and educators in engineering education to maximise GAI benefits while mitigating limitations. Future research should explore effective integration strategies and discipline‐specific best practices as GAI capabilities continue to evolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70064
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engineering Students' Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Karin Wolff, J. Joubert, Johannes L. Jooste
1 citations
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Engineering Students' Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Karin Wolff, J. Joubert, Johannes L. Jooste
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores the evolving landscape of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in engineering education. With technologies like ChatGPT transforming academic practices, universities are experiencing related challenges with integration, ethics and academic integrity. This study was conducted at a South African university to gain insights into how engineering students use GAI applications and their perceptions of these applications in their academic study. Using a survey based on previous studies, data were collected from undergraduate and postgraduate engineering students. The results reveal widespread adoption of GAI applications, with preferences regarding appropriate use and regulation approaches. Students generally support GAI as a learning aid while also expressing concerns about its use in formal assessments. They prefer discipline‐specific guidance over institutional policies, with only 1% supporting a complete ban on GAI use. The findings indicate significant interest in structured education about ethical GAI use, with many students planning to continue using these technologies in their future careers. This study provides insights for engineering educators working to balance innovation with academic integrity, highlighting the need for collaborative approaches between students and educators in engineering education to maximise GAI benefits while mitigating limitations. Future research should explore effective integration strategies and discipline‐specific best practices as GAI capabilities continue to evolve.

Computer Applications in Engineering EducationVol. 33(4)
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Universiteit Stellenbosch
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.