How does the limited resolution of space plasma analyzers affect the accuracy of space plasma measurements?

We investigate the systematic errors in measured plasma velocity distribution functions and their corresponding velocity moments, arising from the limited energy and angular resolution of top-hat electrostatic analyzers. For this purpose, we develop a forward model of a concept analyzer that simulates observations of typical solar wind proton plasma particles with their velocities following a Maxwell distribution function. We then review the standard conversion of the observations to physical parameters and evaluate the errors arising from the limited resolution of the modeled instrument. We show that the limited resolution of the instrument results in velocity distributions that underestimate the core and overestimate the tails of the actual Maxwellian plasma velocity distribution functions. As a consequence, the velocity moments of the observed plasma underestimate the proton density and overestimate the proton temperature. Moreover, we show that the examined errors become significant for cold and fast plasma protons. We finally determine a mathematical formula that predicts these systematic inaccuracies based on specific plasma inputs and instrument features. Our results inform and contextualize future evaluations of observations by analyzers in various plasma regimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Scientific Instruments
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0218667
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does the limited resolution of space plasma analyzers affect the accuracy of space plasma measurements?

P. Louarn, A. Fedorov, Christopher John Owen, Georgios Nicolaou et al.
1 citations
Review of Scientific Instruments
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
1.15
article

How does the limited resolution of space plasma analyzers affect the accuracy of space plasma measurements?

P. Louarn, A. Fedorov, Christopher John Owen, Georgios Nicolaou, Daniel Verscharen, Charalambos Ioannou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigate the systematic errors in measured plasma velocity distribution functions and their corresponding velocity moments, arising from the limited energy and angular resolution of top-hat electrostatic analyzers. For this purpose, we develop a forward model of a concept analyzer that simulates observations of typical solar wind proton plasma particles with their velocities following a Maxwell distribution function. We then review the standard conversion of the observations to physical parameters and evaluate the errors arising from the limited resolution of the modeled instrument. We show that the limited resolution of the instrument results in velocity distributions that underestimate the core and overestimate the tails of the actual Maxwellian plasma velocity distribution functions. As a consequence, the velocity moments of the observed plasma underestimate the proton density and overestimate the proton temperature. Moreover, we show that the examined errors become significant for cold and fast plasma protons. We finally determine a mathematical formula that predicts these systematic inaccuracies based on specific plasma inputs and instrument features. Our results inform and contextualize future evaluations of observations by analyzers in various plasma regimes.

Review of Scientific InstrumentsVol. 96(7)
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie (FR), University College London (GB)
Royal Society, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.