Analysis of the impact of parallel magnetic fluctuations on linear gyrokinetic stability in NSTX-U and verification of gyro-fluid models

In this work, we use the CGYRO gyrokinetic code to analyze two L- and one H-mode discharges from the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) and NSTX-Upgrade (NSTX-U) selected due to their different mix of ion-scale driftwaves, ion temperature gradient (ITG) mode and trapped electron mode (TEM), and electromagnetic instabilities, kinetic ballooning mode (KBM), and micro-tearing mode (MTM) in the plasma core. It is found that the effect of parallel magnetic fluctuations is strongly destabilizing to the unstable KBMs compared to calculations with only perpendicular magnetic fluctuations. Two discharges have a mix of ITG/TEM and MTMs that are predicted to be dominant instability across the plasma radius. The parallel magnetic fluctuations are found to have little effect on the MTM stability but are destabilizing to ITG/TEM modes. To test the validity of the gyro-fluid linear stability codes TGLF and GFS at low aspect ratio, a database of linear growth rates has been created using the CGYRO gyrokinetic code. The database is comprised of various parameter scans around a standardized set of NSTX-U core parameters. It contains a group of electrostatic cases and an electromagnetic group that includes the effects of perpendicular and parallel magnetic fluctuations. Comparing the results from the GFS and TGLF models, we find that GFS exhibits the best agreement with the database of CGYRO linear growth rates. Comparing the model results for the electromagnetic scans shows that GFS captures the effects of parallel magnetic fluctuations accurately, while the TGLF model does not, as it lacks sufficient perpendicular energy resolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Plasmas
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0270873
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the impact of parallel magnetic fluctuations on linear gyrokinetic stability in NSTX-U and verification of gyro-fluid models

J. Candy, E. A. Belli, G. M. Staebler, J.E. Kinsey
4 citations
Physics of Plasmas
Magnetic confinement fusion research
7.48
article

Analysis of the impact of parallel magnetic fluctuations on linear gyrokinetic stability in NSTX-U and verification of gyro-fluid models

J. Candy, E. A. Belli, G. M. Staebler, J.E. Kinsey
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In this work, we use the CGYRO gyrokinetic code to analyze two L- and one H-mode discharges from the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) and NSTX-Upgrade (NSTX-U) selected due to their different mix of ion-scale driftwaves, ion temperature gradient (ITG) mode and trapped electron mode (TEM), and electromagnetic instabilities, kinetic ballooning mode (KBM), and micro-tearing mode (MTM) in the plasma core. It is found that the effect of parallel magnetic fluctuations is strongly destabilizing to the unstable KBMs compared to calculations with only perpendicular magnetic fluctuations. Two discharges have a mix of ITG/TEM and MTMs that are predicted to be dominant instability across the plasma radius. The parallel magnetic fluctuations are found to have little effect on the MTM stability but are destabilizing to ITG/TEM modes. To test the validity of the gyro-fluid linear stability codes TGLF and GFS at low aspect ratio, a database of linear growth rates has been created using the CGYRO gyrokinetic code. The database is comprised of various parameter scans around a standardized set of NSTX-U core parameters. It contains a group of electrostatic cases and an electromagnetic group that includes the effects of perpendicular and parallel magnetic fluctuations. Comparing the results from the GFS and TGLF models, we find that GFS exhibits the best agreement with the database of CGYRO linear growth rates. Comparing the model results for the electromagnetic scans shows that GFS captures the effects of parallel magnetic fluctuations accurately, while the TGLF model does not, as it lacks sufficient perpendicular energy resolution.

Physics of PlasmasVol. 32(7)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), CompX (United States) (US), General Atomics (United States) (US)
Office of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
7.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.