Writing and publishing mixed methods research in the social sciences: Editorial introduction to the mixed methods section of <i>BMS</i>

Over the past fifteen years, there has been significant growth in social science publications on mixed methods research, both in France and internationally. While the use of mixed methods is not new, we are currently witnessing a revival of debates around how qualitative and quantitative approaches are combined and articulated – and, more importantly, a growing body of theoretical reflection on so-called “mixed” research strategies. This editorial introduces the launch of the Mixed Methods section of the BMS . After quickly reviewing the evolution of mixed methods and the challenges they pose for 21st-century social sciences, this text argues for the relevance of this new section. It highlights the need to further address the “integration problems”, to propose alternative frameworks for classifying mixed research strategies, and, more broadly, to promote both methodological pluralism and rigor in research design within the social sciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063251348072
Primary Topic
Data Analysis and Archiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Writing and publishing mixed methods research in the social sciences: Editorial introduction to the mixed methods section of BMS

Thomas Aguilera, Tom Chevalier, Benoît Giry
Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique
Data Analysis and Archiving
article

Writing and publishing mixed methods research in the social sciences: Editorial introduction to the mixed methods section of BMS

Thomas Aguilera, Tom Chevalier, Benoît Giry
article en

Abstract

Over the past fifteen years, there has been significant growth in social science publications on mixed methods research, both in France and internationally. While the use of mixed methods is not new, we are currently witnessing a revival of debates around how qualitative and quantitative approaches are combined and articulated – and, more importantly, a growing body of theoretical reflection on so-called “mixed” research strategies. This editorial introduces the launch of the Mixed Methods section of the BMS . After quickly reviewing the evolution of mixed methods and the challenges they pose for 21st-century social sciences, this text argues for the relevance of this new section. It highlights the need to further address the “integration problems”, to propose alternative frameworks for classifying mixed research strategies, and, more broadly, to promote both methodological pluralism and rigor in research design within the social sciences.

Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie SociologiqueVol. 167(1)
Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR), Sciences Po Rennes, Université de Rennes (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Data Analysis and Archiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.