A Prospective Randomized Study to Predict Bowel Preparation Quality Prior to Colonoscopy: Comparison of Two Stool Collection Methods for the Objective Assessment of Final Rectal Effluent Clarity

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Adequate bowel preparation is essential for high-quality colonoscopy. The clarity of the final rectal effluent can predict its sufficiency and guide additional preparation if necessary. For an objective and reliable clarity assessment, the stool collection method may be as important as the evaluation itself. This study was designed to compare the sensitivity of clarity assessments of effluent collected using two methods: a disposable cardboard bedpan with a white bag (Group I) and a 50 mL transparent plastic container (Group II). <b>Methods</b>: A prospective, single-center, randomized, comparative study was conducted between August 2024 and January 2025. Based on predefined criteria, 37 of 177 randomized patients were excluded, and 140 were analyzed. <b>Results</b>: Inadequate bowel preparation was correctly identified by a team member in 71% of Group I and 23% of Group II (<i>p</i> = 0.033). In adequate cases, the detection sensitivity was 88% and 85% (Groups I and II, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.854). Significantly more patients in Group II either withdrew or failed to submit a photograph of the final rectal effluent. Patients' verbal assessments did not differ significantly between the groups, regardless of bowel preparation quality. <b>Conclusions</b>: Patient self-assessment was an unreliable indicator of bowel cleanliness, highlighting the need for objective, standardized pre-colonoscopy evaluation methods. The use of a disposable cardboard bedpan with a white bag to collect the final rectal effluent may improve the accuracy of predicting inadequate preparation and patient compliance and may allow timely adjustments to bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy in routine endoscopy practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15131717
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Prospective Randomized Study to Predict Bowel Preparation Quality Prior to Colonoscopy: Comparison of Two Stool Collection Methods for the Objective Assessment of Final Rectal Effluent Clarity

Mustafa Gün, Mustafa Kuşak, Kevser Uzunoglu, Serdar Şenol et al.
Diagnostics
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

A Prospective Randomized Study to Predict Bowel Preparation Quality Prior to Colonoscopy: Comparison of Two Stool Collection Methods for the Objective Assessment of Final Rectal Effluent Clarity

Mustafa Gün, Mustafa Kuşak, Kevser Uzunoglu, Serdar Şenol, Mıne Gızem Bıdıl
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Adequate bowel preparation is essential for high-quality colonoscopy. The clarity of the final rectal effluent can predict its sufficiency and guide additional preparation if necessary. For an objective and reliable clarity assessment, the stool collection method may be as important as the evaluation itself. This study was designed to compare the sensitivity of clarity assessments of effluent collected using two methods: a disposable cardboard bedpan with a white bag (Group I) and a 50 mL transparent plastic container (Group II). <b>Methods</b>: A prospective, single-center, randomized, comparative study was conducted between August 2024 and January 2025. Based on predefined criteria, 37 of 177 randomized patients were excluded, and 140 were analyzed. <b>Results</b>: Inadequate bowel preparation was correctly identified by a team member in 71% of Group I and 23% of Group II (<i>p</i> = 0.033). In adequate cases, the detection sensitivity was 88% and 85% (Groups I and II, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.854). Significantly more patients in Group II either withdrew or failed to submit a photograph of the final rectal effluent. Patients' verbal assessments did not differ significantly between the groups, regardless of bowel preparation quality. <b>Conclusions</b>: Patient self-assessment was an unreliable indicator of bowel cleanliness, highlighting the need for objective, standardized pre-colonoscopy evaluation methods. The use of a disposable cardboard bedpan with a white bag to collect the final rectal effluent may improve the accuracy of predicting inadequate preparation and patient compliance and may allow timely adjustments to bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy in routine endoscopy practice.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(13)
Samsun University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.