Inclusion of Sub-Antarctic Macroalgae (Gigartina skosttsbergii) as Feed Ingredient for Grazing Sheep

Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the inclusion impacts of macroalgae <i>Gigartina skottsbergii</i> (Gs) for grazing sheep. Experiment (Exp.) 1 studied the effect of Gs on in vitro gas production (IVGP), dry matter (DM) digestibility (IVDMD), and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emission using three fistulated sheep and 96 h incubation of samples. In Exp. 2, ten Dohne Merino ewes [5-year-old; 47 ± 0.14 kg body weight (BW)] were randomly assigned to dietary treatments supplemented with Gs at 0 or 450 g DM/d per animal. The study lasted 31 days and was preceded by an adaptation period of 9 days. The BW, body conditional score (BCS), and blood were sampled at the first and the last day of the trial. The results of Exp. 1 showed that Gs supplementation reduced (MCP, <i>p</i> = 0.026) gas production (A), lag time (<i>p</i> = 0.013), and IVDMD (<i>p</i> = 0.071), while it enhanced partition factor (PF96; <i>p</i> = 0.004) and microbial crude protein (MCP) (<i>p</i> = 0.054). The concentration of CH<sub>4</sub> decreased after 3 h (<i>p</i> = 0.0002), 6 h (<i>p</i> = 0.013), and 12 h (<i>p</i> = 0.010) with a tendency at 9 h (<i>p</i> = 0.109) and 24 h (<i>p</i> = 0.068). In Exp. 2, there were no diet effects on the initial BW (IBW, <i>p</i> = 0.77), final BW (FBW, <i>p</i> = 0.91), and average daily gain (ADG, <i>p</i> = 0.24) of ewes; however, Gs supplementation decreased BCS (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Of all blood parameters, only the concentration of glucose (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and albumin (<i>p</i> = 0.011) decreased in the Gs group. Overall, our results revealed that the dietary inclusion of Gs (at 450 g DM/d) affected neither the BW nor ADG of ewes; however, Gs was accompanied by lesser IVGP and CH<sub>4</sub> emission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15131976
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusion of Sub-Antarctic Macroalgae (Gigartina skosttsbergii) as Feed Ingredient for Grazing Sheep

Lizbeth E. Robles Jimenez, Manuel González-Ronquillo, Sergio Radic‐Schilling, Navid Ghavipanje et al.
Animals
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Inclusion of Sub-Antarctic Macroalgae (Gigartina skosttsbergii) as Feed Ingredient for Grazing Sheep

Lizbeth E. Robles Jimenez, Manuel González-Ronquillo, Sergio Radic‐Schilling, Navid Ghavipanje, Cinthya Glucevic
article en

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the inclusion impacts of macroalgae <i>Gigartina skottsbergii</i> (Gs) for grazing sheep. Experiment (Exp.) 1 studied the effect of Gs on in vitro gas production (IVGP), dry matter (DM) digestibility (IVDMD), and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emission using three fistulated sheep and 96 h incubation of samples. In Exp. 2, ten Dohne Merino ewes [5-year-old; 47 ± 0.14 kg body weight (BW)] were randomly assigned to dietary treatments supplemented with Gs at 0 or 450 g DM/d per animal. The study lasted 31 days and was preceded by an adaptation period of 9 days. The BW, body conditional score (BCS), and blood were sampled at the first and the last day of the trial. The results of Exp. 1 showed that Gs supplementation reduced (MCP, <i>p</i> = 0.026) gas production (A), lag time (<i>p</i> = 0.013), and IVDMD (<i>p</i> = 0.071), while it enhanced partition factor (PF96; <i>p</i> = 0.004) and microbial crude protein (MCP) (<i>p</i> = 0.054). The concentration of CH<sub>4</sub> decreased after 3 h (<i>p</i> = 0.0002), 6 h (<i>p</i> = 0.013), and 12 h (<i>p</i> = 0.010) with a tendency at 9 h (<i>p</i> = 0.109) and 24 h (<i>p</i> = 0.068). In Exp. 2, there were no diet effects on the initial BW (IBW, <i>p</i> = 0.77), final BW (FBW, <i>p</i> = 0.91), and average daily gain (ADG, <i>p</i> = 0.24) of ewes; however, Gs supplementation decreased BCS (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Of all blood parameters, only the concentration of glucose (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and albumin (<i>p</i> = 0.011) decreased in the Gs group. Overall, our results revealed that the dietary inclusion of Gs (at 450 g DM/d) affected neither the BW nor ADG of ewes; however, Gs was accompanied by lesser IVGP and CH<sub>4</sub> emission.

AnimalsVol. 15(13)
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (MX), Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research (IR), Agricultural Research & Education Organization (IR), Universidad de Magallanes (CL), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX), University of Birjand (IR)
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Universidad de Magallanes
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.