Future Scenarios of Global Fisheries and Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement Under Socio‐Economic and Climate Pathways

Abstract Achieving global climate goals while ensuring food security in a changing climate presents significant challenges, particularly when relying solely on land‐based solutions. Covering over 70% of the Earth's surface, the ocean remains an underutilized resource for climate mitigation. Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) is one such strategy, designed to strengthen the ocean's natural carbon sink, reduce atmospheric CO 2 , and mitigate ocean acidification. However, its implications for fisheries, critical for food security and livelihoods, remain uncertain. This study examines the interplay between global fisheries, OAE, and different future socioeconomic and climatic conditions, using the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) and Representative Concentration Pathways framework. We explore how global fisheries and OAE could evolve under three combined scenarios: SSP1‐2.6 (sustainability‐focused), SSP3‐7.0 (regional rivalry), and SSP5‐8.5 (high fossil fuel dependency). By integrating ecological, economic, societal, and technological perspectives, we develop scenario narratives and quantify key bio‐economic parameters, including technological progress, fishing costs, fisheries management, marine aquaculture, and ecosystem carrying capacity. High‐emission (SSP5‐8.5) and fragmented development (SSP3‐7.0) scenarios present significant barriers to the coexistence of OAE and fisheries, whereas sustainability‐focused pathways (SSP1‐2.6) offer the most favorable conditions for their alignment. Successfully integrating OAE with fisheries management will likely depend on technological advancements, international cooperation, and socio‐economic developments. These scenarios are aligned with those used in model‐based scenario studies conducted under the frameworks of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), providing a shared foundation for future work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth s Future
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ef005478
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Future Scenarios of Global Fisheries and Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement Under Socio‐Economic and Climate Pathways

Ulf Riebesell, Hans Sloterdijk, Linda Kleemann, Natascha Oppelt et al.
2 citations
Earth s Future
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
3.59
article

Future Scenarios of Global Fisheries and Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement Under Socio‐Economic and Climate Pathways

Ulf Riebesell, Hans Sloterdijk, Linda Kleemann, Natascha Oppelt, R. Voss, Wilfried Rickels, Lotta Clara Kluger, Katrin Rehdanz, Kira Lancker, Renato Salvatteci, Caroline Grünhagen, Andreas Oschlies, Patricia Grasse, David Peter Keller, Marie‐Catherine Riekhof, Jörn Oliver Schmidt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Achieving global climate goals while ensuring food security in a changing climate presents significant challenges, particularly when relying solely on land‐based solutions. Covering over 70% of the Earth's surface, the ocean remains an underutilized resource for climate mitigation. Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) is one such strategy, designed to strengthen the ocean's natural carbon sink, reduce atmospheric CO 2 , and mitigate ocean acidification. However, its implications for fisheries, critical for food security and livelihoods, remain uncertain. This study examines the interplay between global fisheries, OAE, and different future socioeconomic and climatic conditions, using the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) and Representative Concentration Pathways framework. We explore how global fisheries and OAE could evolve under three combined scenarios: SSP1‐2.6 (sustainability‐focused), SSP3‐7.0 (regional rivalry), and SSP5‐8.5 (high fossil fuel dependency). By integrating ecological, economic, societal, and technological perspectives, we develop scenario narratives and quantify key bio‐economic parameters, including technological progress, fishing costs, fisheries management, marine aquaculture, and ecosystem carrying capacity. High‐emission (SSP5‐8.5) and fragmented development (SSP3‐7.0) scenarios present significant barriers to the coexistence of OAE and fisheries, whereas sustainability‐focused pathways (SSP1‐2.6) offer the most favorable conditions for their alignment. Successfully integrating OAE with fisheries management will likely depend on technological advancements, international cooperation, and socio‐economic developments. These scenarios are aligned with those used in model‐based scenario studies conducted under the frameworks of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), providing a shared foundation for future work.

Earth s FutureVol. 13(7)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (DE), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE), WorldFish (MY)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
3.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.